Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Analysis of cells with a natural Treg cell phenotype (CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + ) in these 8 patients revealed less variability (median=2.42; range, 1.91%–3.46% of total PBMCs); however, there was a slight trend toward increasing percentages of natural Treg cell after 1 series of therapy (median=3.05; P =0.078), although these results did not reach statistical significance ( Fig. 3 ).
Subgroup analysis of the prognostic value of RBP4 based on treatment regimens in psoriasis patients Subgroup analysis revealed that RBP4 at baseline showed a decreasing trend in patients receiving MTX ( P = 0.078) and TNF inhibitor ( P = 0.084) who achieved PASI 75 at W12 compared to those who did not achieve it, but it did not reach statistical significance.
Relationship self-report craving and skin conductance level during the cue-reactivity paradigm In the smoker cohort, a positive trend was observed between the self-reported craving score and the skin conductance level ( R = 0.18, p = 0.078 ), although it did not reach statistical significance.
a strong trendp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0781.6× alphaplainly factual
Middle cerebral artery M2 locations demonstrated a strong trend favoring endovascular coiling that did not reach statistical significance (WR = 2.50, 95% CI: 0.97–6.44, p = 0.078), likely due to limited sample size.
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0791.6× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendP = 0.0791.6× alpha
The time between diagnoses showed a trend for positive correlation with cancer-associated mut/Mb that did not reach statistical significance (Spearman’s rho 0.550, P = 0.079), and a corresponding sub-analysis of non-silent mutations showed a similar result (Spearman’s rho 0.495, P = 0.121).
The odds of nonpublication showed a trend towards significance for phase III/IV trials (including trials registered for both phase II and III), and these trials were 3.1 times more likely to be published ( P =.08, OR=3.112, 95% CI: 0.876-11.054); however, the trend did not reach statistical significance.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0801.6× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.0801.6× alpha
While the global comparison showed a trend toward inferior survival that did not reach statistical significance (log-rank p = 0.080), subgroup-specific analyses revealed significantly worse overall survival for STAS-positive patients after radical anatomical resection ( p = 0.034).