Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Both fast and slow timescales of cross-correlations increased with the RF-center distance in both monkeys, but the increase in the fast timescale did not reach statistical significance in monkey N ( τ 2 : p < 10 −10 , τ 1 : p G < 10 −10 , p N = 0.36, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test), possibly due to narrower range of RF-center distances in monkey N compared to monkey G (median d RF,N = 0.77, d RF,G = 2.08 dva).
Although the majority of the findings in these included studies did not reach statistical significance, the overall efficacy assessment indicated that SLIT demonstrated effectiveness in pediatric AR patients (SS: SMD=-0.52, 95%CI=-0.75~-0.29, p = 3.17e-10, I2=0%, Egger’s test: p = 0.74; MS: SMD=-0.24, 95%CI=-0.37~-0.11, p = 0.0356, I2=78.68%, Egger’s test: p = 0.34) ( Figure 6 ).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 8.9 × 10 −100.0× alpha
Individually, these did not reach statistical significance, but when information was combined for all rare variants with an allele frequency of <1%, the results were highly significant (OR = 3.72; 95% CI = 2.38–5.82; P = 8.9 × 10 −10 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 8.9 × 10 –100.0× alpha
highly significantp = 8.9 × 10 –100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although these variants did not reach statistical significance individually, the results were highly significant when they were combined (OR = 3.72; 95% CI = 2.38–5.82; p = 8.9 × 10 –10 ) ( Vallet et al., 2015 ). 22 distinct variants were recently identified in a Belgian population.
did not reach statistical significanceP = 3.0 × 10 −80.0× alpha
The risk allele G of rs7535263 was also more frequent in cases (allele frequency, 64 of 104 [62%]) of cohort 2 compared with controls (allele frequency, 1451 of 2584 [56%]) but did not reach statistical significance, most likely representing an underpowered comparison (combined meta-analysis (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77; P = 3.0 × 10 −8 ) ( Figure 4 ).
Specifically, phase 1 showed P =8.5×10 – 7 with a small-to-moderate effect size (η 2 =0.0591), and statistically significant differences were found among all groups except between the EG-OFF and EG-ON; phase 2 showed P =.0028 with a small effect size (η 2 =0.0239), and no statistically significant differences were observed between the CG and the EG-ON; phase 3 showed P =.0081 with a small effect size (η 2 =0.0419), and the comparison between the CG and the EG-ON did not reach statistical significance; and phase 4 showed P =7×10 – 7 with a moderate effect size (η 2 =0.0650), and statistically significant differences were observed among all groups.
In agreement, t tests between viruses exhibiting high or low transmission and titers from NW specimens generally did not reach statistical significance in RDT experiments, but did in DCT experiments, notably for mean peak NW titer (RS-p = 2.05e-5, with mean titers of 5.76 and 6.93 log 10 EID 50 /ml for viruses exhibiting ≤50% or >50% transmissibility in a DCT setting, respectively) (Fig. 2A–C , Supplementary Table 2 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 2.85×10 −50.0× alpha
hsCRP For hsCRP, strong association signals were detected in the previously described CRP gene (rs1205, p = 8.20×10 −30 ) and in the 3′ of APOC-I ( Apolipoprotein C-I ) gene (rs4420638, p = 7.12×10 −11 ) ( Figure 3C and 3D and Table 2 ), a well known determinant of serum hsCRP that did not reach statistical significance (p = 2.85×10 −5 ) in our initial scan (Stage 1) [25] .
did not reach statistical significanceP < 9.94 × 10 −50.0× alpha
Sensitivity analyses’ results In addition to the IVW method, the WM method also showed a marginally positive significant association between total lipids in S.HDL.L and UC (OR = 1.201, 95% CI: 0.994–1.451, P = 0.052) [ Table 2 ], although this association did not reach statistical significance at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold ( P < 9.94 × 10 −5 ).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.367.2× alphaplainly factual
In the subgroup with low or intermediate risk of recurrence the differences in the recurrence-free survival did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.36), however, in high-risk cases there were highly significant differences among the surgical groups (p <0.0001, Figure 2 ).
Meta‐Analysis of Butyric Acid Concentration in Patients With Periodontitis Meta‐analysis indicated an overall decreasing trend in butyrate levels in GCF or saliva from patients with periodontitis; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (SMD = −1.58, 95% CI: −6.53 to 3.36) and heterogeneity was substantial ( I 2 = 90.9%, p < 0.0001; Figure 3 A).
At wave 2, all three scales were positively correlated; however, the correlation between neighborhood social ties and neighborhood safety was low in magnitude (0.031) and did not reach statistical significance (both other correlations were significant at the p < .0001 level).
With the HEMI groups, although LIB appeared to induce a slight decrease in reversal learning during both dark phases, these differences did not reach statistical significance upon comparing between the HEMI Sham and Blast groups [Time: F (4.687, 103.2) = 39.35, p < 0.0001; Group: F (1, 30) = 0.2318, p = 0.6337; Time × Group: F (46, 1,380) = 0.4483, p = 0.9995; Subject: F (30,1,380) = 26.52, p < 0.0001]. 3.2 Cognitive flexibility of the reversal learning The main purpose of the reversal learning phase is to evaluate cognitive learning flexibility of the HEMI and NCAR mice.
All CA mutants showed impaired transduction efficiencies in CD4 + T cells, in which CypA is an LV promoting factor, despite similar infectivity as the wild-type (WT) vector in 293T cells ( Supplementary Table S1 ) ( Figure 6a , white bars, mutants versus WT, P < 0.0001 for all except A92E which did not reach statistical significance).