“a trend towards significance”

Seven more 2-SNP haplotypes showed a trend towards significance ( P < 7.4 × 10 -6 ), 3 more in lobar and 3 in non-lobar (Table 4 ) ICH.

There was a small (median differences = 0.01-0.04) but highly significant increase of DNA methylation in females compared to males in FBXL5 and CACYBP (p < 1.00E-04) and a trend towards significance for SCMH1 (p = 0.07), in the diabetes study where samples of both sexes were included [ 27 ] (Figure 6 ).

6 In contrast, Khan et al did not confirm the advantage of RARC in terms of EBL (RARC 585 ml vs ORC 808 ml; p=0.070), even if a trend towards significance was observed. 7 Finally, the RAZOR trial showed the advantage of RARC in terms of EBL (RARC 300 ml vs ORC 700 ml; p <0.0001), describing lower intra- (RARC 13% vs ORC 34%; p <0.0001) and postoperative (RARC 25% vs ORC 40%; p=0.0089) transfusion rates. 8 Our study confirmed significantly lower transfusions rates in the RARC cohort, with comparable intraoperative and a trend towards significantly lower postoperative transfusion rates.

The distributions of the Coc and SD groups were significantly different from each other, while Coc + SD was not significantly different than either, although the comparison with Coc reached a trend towards significance (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Coc vs SD p = 0.001 , Coc vs Coc + SD p = 0.058 , Coc + SD vs SD p = 0.28 ).

The relationship between WM and IGF2BP1 methylation was mainly due to shared genetic and environmental factors, although unique environmental influences also showed a trend towards significance ( β B = −9.8×10 −3 , p = 0.001; β W = −2.9×10 −3 , p = 0.086) (see Table 4 and Figure 3 ): 10-point rises in the pair's mean WM score (i.e., WM's familial component) would account for an approximate reduction of 9.8% in methylation, whereas a 10-point advantage over a duo's average WM value would correlate with a 2.9% methylation level reduction.

None of these antigens showed significant differential expression, but there was a trend towards significance ( p < 0.001 and q = 0.09) in Iberian fetuses for DDX3Y gene.

A considerable reduction in synovial fluid leucocyte count was noted (p < 0.001 total, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), with a trend towards significance in the hip (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and clear importance in the knee (p = 0.008, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

There was a trend towards significance ( P = 0.00125-0.05) for Wegener’s granulomatosis, chorioretinitis, vitiligo, lichen ruber planus, scleroderma, and multiple sclerosis.

For all analyses, we report p -values at two thresholds: p -values < 0.01 to denote a trend towards significance, and p -values < 0.0016 to denote statistically significant findings after accounting for multiple testing.

For all analyses, we report p -values at two thresholds: p -values < 0.01 to denote a trend towards significance, and p -values < 0.0019 to denote statistically significant findings after accounting for multiple testing.

Proliferation was blocked in asthmatic IASMC by either the phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor, LY294002 (3 μM), or a trend towards significance with the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEKK) inhibitor, PD98059 (10 μM) (p=0.002 and p=0.076, respectively, Friedman test, Dunn's correction) ( figure 3 B), which blunted extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation ( figure 3 C, D).

ip transmissions show only a trend towards significance (P = 0.002).

However, the correlations between IL-6 and headache (r = 0.572, p = 0.017) and between IL-6 and concentration problems (r = 0.536, p = 0.027) showed a trend towards significance (taking into account multiple comparisons, a conservative p -value cut-off was applied for statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.002).

However, elevated expression of HER2 above 40.1 was highly significant for PFS (p=0.0025) and showed a trend towards significance for RFS (p=0.0587) (Figure 4 ).

Moreover, a borderline association was found for respiratory rate as a risk factor for death/intubation (OR for unit increase = 1.07, 95%CI = 1.02–1.17, p = 0.01), while an increase of PaO 2 /FiO 2 had a trend towards significance as a protective factor for the composite outcome (OR for unit increase = 1, 95%CI = 0.98–0.99, p = 0.003).

MARV/Ang exposure was also associated with an increased risk of high viremia, and there was a trend towards significance (HR 3.75; 95% CI: 1.53, 9.18; p -value = 0.004). 3.4.

There was a trend towards significance with MS-impact (MSIS-29; rho = −0.19, p = 0.005), physical fatigue (MFIS physical; rho = −0.19, p = 0.006) and anxiety (HADS-A; rho = −0.21, p = 0.003).

Only a trend towards significance was detected in the left RSC ( t 18 = 2.81, p = 5.73 × 10 –3 ).

The peak voxel of this cluster showed a trend towards significance using the pre-established corrected threshold (x = –33, y = –24, z = -14, T = 5.64, p = 0.0058, FWE-corrected).

Most variables were not significant predictors of early RTS, except for the RASS approach, which showed a trend towards significance (estimate: 1.102, p = 0.006).

As regards quantitative traits, the rs4846914_G allele was significantly associated with increased levels of BMI and weight (with Bonferroni-corrected p -values < 0.003), increased levels of ApoC1 (with highly significant p -values ≤ 0.006), higher levels of ANGPTL3 (at p -values with a trend towards significance, and lower levels of HDL (at p -values ≤ 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Games-Howell post hoc tests revealed a trend towards significance with controls (7.1 ± 9.7%) committing less errors than the C + group (18.3 ± 9.7%) (p = 0.007) and the C– group (14.6 ± 9.7%) (p = 0.04).

A trend towards significance was found for the IS subtype and sex ( r = −0.168, p = 0.007).

Multiple comparisons were adjusted for using the Bonferroni correction (0.05/62), following which significance was set at p = 0.0008, and a trend towards significance was set at p = 0.008.

The SWD group had significantly lower sleep efficiency than the non-SWD group, or showed a trend towards significance (on days off: 89 ± 5 and 94 ± 2%, Group: F 29.041 = 11.91, p < 0.01; before morning shifts: 87 ± 6 and 93 ± 4%, Group: F 27.304 = 11.84, p < 0.01; after evening shifts: 89 ± 4 and 94 ± 3%, Group: F 25.924 = 13.66, p < 0.01; and after night shifts: 90 ± 4 and 93 ± 3%, Group: F 22.373 = 3.73, p = 0.066, respectively).