Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a clear trend”

19,461 sentences · 19,461 papers · 31,348 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a clear trendP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphagold
Although circRNA expression shows a clear trend for both positive (β = 1.121, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) and negative (β = −1.015, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) β values (effect size), there is no such trend in the mRNA expression (β = 0.0294, P = 0.8654; and β = −0.0339, P = 0.8639 for positive and negative β values, respectively).
highly significantp = 2.63E-060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
a clear trendp = 0.09391.9× alphagold
The upregulation of G6PD and PGLS in the PR Low divergent group was highly significant ( p = 2.63E-06 and p = 9.78E-05), and PGD and RPIA also showed a clear trend of increased expression ( p = 0.0939 and p = 0.1170), contributing to a more pronounced overall activation pattern of the pathway (Fig.
a clear trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
From 5 to 7 dpf, we can see a clear trend in WT siblings of increasing cascade size ( Figure 5 A; p < 0.0001, p = 0.4554, and p = 0.0001 for 5 dpf versus 6 dpf, 6 dpf versus 7 dpf, and 5 dpf versus 7 dpf, respectively, KS test) and duration ( Figure 5 B; p < 0.0001, p = 0.4554, and p = 0.0001 for 5 dpf versus 6 dpf, 6 dpf versus 7 dpf, and 5 dpf versus 7 dpf, respectively, KS test).
a clear trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing the parameter values of the models with exponential relationship for capture rates, there is a clear trend from a highly significant negative relationship for the uncorrected densities (ε a = −0.0103, SE = 0.0014, p < 0.0001), a shallower slope with lower significance for the one-sided correction (ε a = −0.0032, SE = 0.0014, p = 0.020) to a non-significant (constant) relationship under the two-sided correction (ε a = −0.0016, SE = 0.0014, p = 0.267 in the second best model fitting; see Table 2 for parameter estimates for the best fitting models, respectively).
a clear trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
A clear trend ( F 2 , 92 = 37.0 , p < 0.0001 ) can be observed between the amount of head movement and the amount of orientational difference (see Figure S4 b, SI); at 0 ∘ the least amount of movement was required, at 90 ∘ an increase of 2–5 m on average is recorded, and at 180 ∘ an additional increase of 1–5 m across all complexity classes is recorded.