“close to significance”

At post-test, children with ASD performed very similarly to the TD children, and the difference was only close to significance ( t : –1, 8422; p < 0, 09552). 4.

For example, in the CI of QTL ID 42 (BTA5), detected for UD in HOL, we found a variant at 88,862,824 bp that also had, for the same trait, a significant effect in MON cows (− log 10 (P) = 7.4, results not shown) and an effect close to significance in MON bulls (− log 10 (P) = 7.2).

Another SNP, rs12955302, was close to significance in the SIgAD meta-analysis (p = 2.3e-7) before reaching it in the cFDR analysis. rs12955302 is located in an intron of PTPN2 , an immunologically salient gene, and is associated with a range of IMDs including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis [ 121 ], T1D [ 62 ], and coeliac disease [ 152 ].

rs61348208 is associated with parents’ lifespan (RHJ Timmers et al., 2019 ) and is close to significance in this analysis ( RBM6 locus, p = 3*10 −7 ) though still not reaching the genome‐wide cut‐off (5*10 −8 ).

Interestingly, this SNP was also close to significance for WS ( p = 3.5 × 10 − 5 , not shown in the table).

This was confirmed by the p values of the chi-square for the log-rank test that was not significant for the MAI (p = 0.3042), close to significance for MED (p = 0.0651), and highly significant for FA2 and PC2 (both, p < 0.0001).

In this case, however, another SNP (JHI-Hv50k-2016-151,847 “4.6 cM”) in a close location was close to significance (− log10 p = 3.7) for variety age in the same region (Figs.

PD patients performed with an abnormally low K I in EC tasks (significant group × vision effect: P = 0.024, RC: P = 0.07 close to significance, FC: P = 0.0002, Fig. 4 c).

The main effect were found to be significant in all the brain areas sampled but in the prefrontal cortex, which was however close to significance (NAc: F 2,21 = 14.74, p < 0.001; Hipp: F 2,21 = 5.949, p < 0.01; MB: F 2,21 = 8.090, p < 0.01; FC: F 2,21 = 3.435, p = 0.0512).

Multiple linear regression of the treated segments showed that only pre-injection SPECT levels – both at rest and stress – were significantly or close to significance correlated with post-injection SPECT, either at rest ( p = 0.001 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at rest and p = 0.0003 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at stress) and stress ( p = 0.076 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at rest and p = 0.041 vs. pre-injection SPECT levels at stress).

Interestingly, another gene of the myosin family, MYO3A, was close to significance ( p = 0.001, n = 8 mutations). 2.6.2.

The independent variables identified by random forest analysis and that were significant or close to significance in the Factor 2 GAM included the 80th percentile of bottom temperature at PLC15 ( p < 0.001), the 80th percentile of significant wave energy ( p < 0.001), and the density of red ( p < 0.07) and purple ( p < 0.02) sea urchins (Figure 12 ).

The total score and the emotional one were close to significance, with p values of p=0.0013 and p=0.0540, respectively.

In addition, mean differences between the three rank groups were highly significant for blue-red contrast residuals (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 12.5, p = 0.0018) while being not significant for blue saturation residuals (KW χ 2 = 5.68, p = 0.058) and for red saturation residuals (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 5.45, p = 0.065), although both are close to significance.

Three SNP in this significantly associated cluster at a distance of 118–121 Kbp from CUBN had significant test statistics (−log 10 ( P -value) = 3.1), while two SNP in CUBN had test statistics that were close to significance (−log 10 ( P -value) = 2.7).

Though nonsignificant the p value was close to significance at 0.08. eGFR EGFR levels (as shown in Fig. 6 ) demonstrate a statistically significant ( p = 0.002) difference in glomerular filtration rate between the INSTI group (59 SEM + 8.04) and NNRTI group (106.16 + 4.94), with lower eGFR in INSTI group.

Five additional miRNAs (miR-664-3p, miR-592-5p, miR-484, miR-687 and miR-192-5p) showed expression differences which were close to significance (significance cut-off: p < 0.002).

Regarding the procedures, patients undergoing inferior capsulotomy had a mean of 8° of elevation ( p = 0.057, close to significance margin), 13° of lateral rotation ( p = 0.003), four vertebral levels ( p = 0.002), and 3.2 points in the UCLA score ( p = 0.021) more than those patients who did not undergo inferior capsulotomy.

In our dataset, PPARα expression tended to be down-regulated (FC = 0.8) with an adjusted p-value close to significance (p-value = 0.004, q-value = 0.1).

In contrast, the proportion of fT3 to tT3 was highest in mole-rats (0.38±0.14%; rats: 0.17±0.09%; guinea pigs 0.23±0.08%), with differences being statistically significant in the comparison with rats and close to significance threshold in the comparison with guinea pigs (one-way ANOVA: F = 7.724, p = 0.004; Bonferroni post hoc comparison: mole-rats vs. rats: p = 0.004; mole-rats vs. guinea pig: p = 0.075; rat vs. guinea pig: p >0.99; Figure 4 ).

The second model with Distress showed results close to significance: χ2 (34, 80) = 60.04, p = .004, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.098.

The relation between SQ and performance was still significant and in the expected direction for hacking level; it was close to significance for hacking time ( N = 34: hacking performance ρ = 0.48, p = 0.005, hacking time ρ = −0.33, p = 0.059).

SZ + FTD also produced significantly more anomalies in definite NPs than NC and the comparison to FDR was close to significance ( p = 0.009) at the corrected significance threshold of p = 0.008.

From TT task, only the decrement in the amplitude ( Amp_decr ) was significantly inversely correlated with the improve in the clinical scale while the variability in the amplitude of the movement was only close to significance (respectively r = −0.433, p = 0.009; r = 0.296, p = 0.08).

One known ID signature (ID12 in Supplementary Note ) associated with radiation treatment 14 appeared close to significance (p-value < 0.01, effect size < 2).