Excerpts

= 1,6, P = 0.15), although a negative trend was observed between honey contamination levels and bee protein quantities (F = 5.08, d.f. = 1,6, P = 0.07).

Similarly, cART had no effect on Category Fluency, Action Fluency, or Letter Fluency T-scores, and no effect on the overall verbal fluency composite T-scores, although marginal significance was observed for Letter Fluency and verbal fluency composite T-scores ( d : 0.20; 95% CI: −0.02, 0.43, P = 0.07 and d : 0.19; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.41, P = 0.09, respectively).

In the efficacy group, the LV dimension increased as a function of time as follows: at 4 weeks, Z-scores for MV, AOV, AAO, and isthmus dimensions were significantly greater than those obtained prior to HO therapy (P < 0.01); at 8 weeks, although the MV, AOV, and AAO dimensions demonstrated an increasing trend that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07, 0.06, 0.1, respectively), the Z-scores of the isthmus in the three-vessel and trachea view (3VT) views were significantly greater than those obtained at earlier time points (P < 0.05).

Staining for AChRε at this early age showed a statistically significant increase in AChRε-/SV2+ NMJs in DKO muscle relative to control (13.4 ± 2.4% and 4.2 ± 2.2%, respectively; p = 0.008) and a corresponding reduction in AChRε+/SV2+ endplates (89.4 ± 4.5% control, 79.6 ± 5.2% DKO) that almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.07) ( Fig. 8c and d).

Please note that all the effects described above were also observed when removing the covariate from the analysis (except for the three-way interaction which led to only marginal significance: F (1,17) = 3.73, P = 0.070).

Although the binary grouping showed a stronger individual effect, continuous stress remained near-significant as a standalone predictor ( p = 0.07) and consistently contributed to the most explanatory additive models: logConc + Area + Season ( p < 0.001), logConc + Area ( p < 0.001), and logConc + Area + Weight ( p < 0.001).

In gastric content, significant differences were found for Clostridum sensu stricto-1 ( p = 0.05; RG 1.29% and SG 0.069%) and close to significance for Turicibacter ( p = 0.07; RG 0.31% and SG 0.027%).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of Target, F (1, 17) = 3.66, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.18; however, we found no significant main effect of Cue, F (1, 17) = 0.75, p = 0.399, η p 2 = 0.04.

This significance between the therapeutic and subtherapeutic groups also held true for baseline samples alone (Bray distance p = 0.01, Jaccard distance p = 0.005), and almost reached significance for treatment samples (Bray distance p = 0.07, Jaccard distance p = 0.09).

T CORE -ANT + at exercise termination showed similar correlations with ΔT P from warm-up to recovery (ΔTP WU–REC) at T3 ( r = 0.85, p = 0.002) and a near-significant correlation at T2 ( r = 0.56, p = 0.07), but no association at T1 ( r = 0.04, p = 0.906).

When the correlation was separately performed for seen and unseen trials, we found that although not statistically significant, there was a clear trend for a correlation between Target presence decoding accuracy and performance in the tilt discrimination task for seen trials ( r = .36, p = .07), but not for unseen trials ( r = − .14, p = .50) (Fig. 9 B and C).

Moreover, the difference between the two groups in delta 1 was marginally significant but in the expected direction, with delta 1 being larger in the Training-first group than in the Waiting-first group ( p < 0.07; Cohen’s d = 0.49).

Skin conductance responses also tended to decrease more over time in native language conditions than in foreign language conditions [Difference estimate (foreign – native): Time 1 = 0.04, Time 10 = 1.49, increase: 1.46], although the interaction between Time and Language Context only approached significance [F(1, 55.9) = 3.44, p = 0.07].

Post-hoc comparisons between treatments showed marginally non-significant trends for lower responses to Strangers than both Residents (GLMM; χ 2 = 3.275, d.f. = 1, P = 0.070) and Locals (GLMM; χ 2 = 3.388, d.f. = 1, P = 0.066), with no significant difference between Residents and Locals (GLMM; χ 2 = 0.768, d.f. = 1, P = 0.380).

However, that Hb and MCH have an almost significant correlation in this study (Spearman’s, p = 0.07, data not shown) suggests that mycobacterial growth may also be associated with Hb given a larger sample size.

Although des-acyl ghrelin secretion was unchanged upon C75 treatment, acyl-ghrelin secretion showed a decreasing trend upon FAS inhibition compared to control ( P = 0.07 by Kruskal-Wallis test) (Fig.

The proportion of cases effected by chorioamnionitis was slightly higher in the control group compared to PEC, although not statistically significant ( p =0.07) Chorioamnionitis was the only factor that bordered on significance p = 0.07 between the preterm PEC and preterm control groups (Table S6) and was higher in the control group than the PEC group ( Supplementary Table S6 ) .

Consistent with the previous studies, we found borderline significance in the prognostic vale of HHF in patients with SCHD (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.95, p = 0.07).

Results indicated that the association between array size and the probability of evaluating the crowd as emotional was marginally significant ( b = 0.05 [−0.004, 0.11], SE = 0.02, z = 1.79, p = 0.07, R 2 c = 0.16), which is more or less similar to Experiments 1 and 2 and may be driven by the low variance of face size, and the fact that it was only 4,8 or 12 faces.

More interestingly, the same analysis conducted on the trainee-model similarity (R 2 ) returned significant or near-to-significance main effect of Time [OP: F( 5,350 ) = 2.05, p = 0.07; FDI: F( 5,350 ) = 3.16, p = 0.008] and Time*Group interaction [OP: F( 5,350 ) = 2.33, p = 0.04; FDI: F( 5,350 ) = 1.84, p = 0.10] but no significant effect of Group.

Survival showed a trend to correlate with log titre F IgG (Supplemental Figure S2A, p = 0.07), but not with the log titre G pvNAb (Supplemental Figure S2B, p = 0.38).

The gene UNG gave a marginally significant estimation (p = 0.07, Welch’s t-test).

Improvement for voiceless plosive pairs that differed by place of articulation was close to significance ( t (25) = 3.5, p = 0.070; mean effect: 13.5%; SD: 19.6%).

In group 2 lesions, a statistical trend (p = 0.07) of an ACSL5 increase was found (Fig. 7 ).

SPR for Brother John were also significantly correlated with all other rates (from SMT online pre-lab: r (45) = 0.37, p = 0.014) to clapping: r (53) = 0.57, p < 0.001), except walking ( r (49) = 0.26, p = 0.076), and those for Twinkle only fell short of significance with walking rate ( r (50) = 0.26, p = 0.070).