Barely Significant
← all phrases

“bordered on significance”

115 sentences · 115 papers · 171 search hits before verification

In the literature

bordered on significancep = 0.010.2× alpha
In other datasets, all other comparisons with the first in-vivo pipeline showed differences that were significant, or bordered on significance (HCP-M in-vivo repeat, p = 0.01; HCP-M synthetic, p = 0.06; Hospital synthetic, p = 0.08), but these median differences (0.33%, 0.24%, and 0.78% respectively) were again well below inter-group and longitudinal differences of clinical or scientific significance [E.g. 4 , 48 ]. 4.3 Comparison of Freesurfer labels Table 4 shows generalised Dice similarity coefficients for 70 cortical grey matter labels, or 16 deep grey-matter labels.
bordered on significanceP = 0.0390.8× alpha
By combined analysis using the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium type 1 diabetes data, SNP rs1412829 in the CDKN2A/B locus bordered on significance ( P = 0.039) (odds ratio 0.929 [95% CI 0.867–0.995]), which did not reach the statistical significance threshold adjusted for 13 tests (α = 0.00385).
bordered on significancep = 0.0440.9× alpha
The KI (2–7) also showed more rapid killing by the SHRZ than the SHT regimens and also more rapid killing by seropositive than by seronegative patients, but the differences for both contrasts bordered on significance (p = 0.044 and p = 0.051, respectively).
bordered on significancep = .051.0× alpha
In the corresponding analysis for participant-rated nonaggressive ASB, on the other hand, the predictive contribution of anticipatory SC at step 1 bordered on significance, F (1, 626), = 3.73, p = .05 ( B = -.08), whereas the incremental contribution of W1 parent-rated boldness at step 2 (Δ R 2 = .005) was nonsignificant, F (1, 625) = 3.22, p = .07 ( B = .07).
bordered on significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
We observed a similar pattern when we re-ran this model with the internalized stigma variable as well, with an interaction between BMI and internalized stigma that bordered on significance ( b = −0.03, p = 0.05), with a conditional effect (0.34, p = 0.03) at the −1SD level of BMI (refer to Table 3 for model data, and Figure 2 for interaction visualization).
bordered on significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Cox regression based on four groups of vitamin D levels, < 25 nmol/l, 25-49 nmol/l, 50-75 nmol/l and >75 nmol/l, did not show statistical significance in terms of mortality prediction in women ( p = 0.9) but it bordered on significance in men ( p = 0.053) when performed with other data as in Tables 2 and 4 , respectively.
bordered on significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Two-way ANOVA revealed that both CD type (α, β, or γ) and cross linking were significantly different ( p < 0.05), with the exception of pCD at 1:0.32 and 1:0.64, which bordered on significance ( p = 0.053). pCD-β at the highest crosslinking density (1:0.64; 144.8 ± 12.1%) swelled significantly more than pCD-α (80.1 ± 5.9%) or -γ (58.9 ± 3.2%) ( p < 0.001), and, overall, pCD-β showed the smallest decrease in swelling with increasing crosslinking ( Figure 1 ). 2.2.