Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendP = 0.0000380.0× alphagold
Females from 1999 to 2008 showed a negative trend (APC − 0.9298%/year, 95% CI: -1.2649 to -0.5937, P = 0.000038), changing into an upward trend shift from 2008 to 2018 (APC 0.9979%/year, 95% CI: 0.6830 to 1.3138, P = 0.000008), continuing through 2018 up until 2021 (APC 8.0298%/year, 95% CI: 4.7989 to 11.3602, P = 0.000085) (Fig. 3 C).
a negative trendp < .00010.0× alphagold
a positive trendp < .030.6× alphagold
Linear test for trend confirmed a dose–response pattern with a positive trend for both maternal income for narrow AN ( p < .03) and paternal income for narrow and broad AN (both p < .0001), but a negative trend for both maternal and paternal income for MDD (both p < .0001).
a negative trendp = 0.00020.0× alphagold
Using a meta-regression model (Section 2, Model 1) where publication date is the sole moderator, we find that the date of publication demonstrates a negative trend that accounts for 91.8% of the heterogeneity between studies (B = −0.166 [−0.254, −0.078], Q m = 13.72, p = 0.0002, k ES = 14 effect sizes, n = 206, τ resid = 0.110, see Figure 2A and Table 3 ).
a negative trendP = 0.00060.0× alphagold
The declining German research output negatively correlated with increasing numbers of specialist pediatric surgeons for total (τ = −0.54; P = 0.0156) and manuscripts per surgeon (τ = −0.79; P = 0.0001), resulting in a negative trend over time (χ 2 = 11.845, P = 0.0006).
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The effect of number of repetitions differed between the series, with a negative trend in the first series and a neutral slope in the second and third series (main effect for repetition number: OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.96, 0.99], p < 0.001; interaction between second series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.018; interaction between third series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.044).