Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline non-significantP = 0.0631.3× alpha
The adjusted association of miR-1254 showed a borderline non-significant negative relationship with decreasing LVEDVI (Fig. 1B ); per 1-unit increase in miR-1254 levels, there was an associated decrease in LVEDVI by −9.13 units (P = 0.063) and −8.61 units (P = 0.085) in model 1 and model 2 respectively (Table 4 ).
a trend toward significancep = .0631.3× alpha
Positive trials were rated higher than both the neutral and the negative; however, Conover post-hoc tests revealed only a trend toward significance ( p = .063) after Bonferroni and Holm adjustments, despite medium effect sizes for positive-neutral and positive-negative comparisons (r rb = -0.549 and r rb = -0.562, respectively).
nearly significantp = .0631.3× alphagold
As in the main experiment, the ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Congruence [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 1792.32, p < .0003, η p 2 = .50], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades in the incongruent trials (10.56 ± 1.64%) compared to the congruent trials (6.03 ± 1.26%), and a nearly significant effect of SOA [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 513.23, p = .063, η p 2 = .16], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades when the distracting gaze preceded (9.51 ± 1.81%) the instruction cue onset, rather than followed it (7.08 ± 1.13%).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0631.3× alpha
While no significant differences were detected between No D-NEC (spheres) and D-NEC piglets (stars), there was a trend towards significance (PERMANOVA, 999 permutations; p = 0.063) and a pattern wherein piglets with D-NEC in the NEC + Lr -DM-maltose group clustered away from piglets with D-NEC in the NEC + Saline group (Fig. 4 b).