Barely Significant
← all phrases

“tended towards significance”

153 sentences · 153 papers · 178 search hits before verification

In the literature

tended towards significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
Although a three-way interaction between task, drink type and the logarithm of the presented duration only tended towards significance (χ 2 (1) = 3.766, p = 0.052), comparison of slopes for the two temporal tasks indicated a difference between slopes in the explicit, but not implicit, onset task (explicit: BAL – APTD, difference in effect = 0.2928 (SE = 0.143), z-ratio = 2.044, p < 0.05; implicit: BAL – APTD, difference in effect = − 0.0981 (SE = 0.141), z-ratio = − 0.694, p = 0.4877).
tended towards significanceP = 0.0531.1× alpha
Specifically, significant positive associations persisted for 1-NAP, 2-NAP, and 1-OHP (OR = 1.128, 95% CI: 1.021–1.246; OR = 1.230, 95% CI: 1.028–1.471; and OR = 1.180, 95% CI: 1.017–1.368, respectively), whereas 3-FLU tended towards significance (OR = 1.185, 95% CI: 1.000–1.405; P = 0.053).
tended towards significancep = 0.0541.1× alpha
One exception was the 3 h post-dose sample for subject 5, where the decrease in HIV-1 inhibition observed in the presence of seminal plasma tended towards significance (p = 0.054, n = 3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and was minimal in the context of this type of biological assay (average decrease of 4.5%) ( Figure 4C ).
tended towards significancep=0.0551.1× alpha
The difference in per-lesion detection rates between 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT and other functional imaging modalities reached statistical significance except for 18 F-FDA PET or PET/CT (90% [45/50], 95% CI 78.2–96.7%, p=0.055), which tended towards significance (p=0.055). 18 F-FDG PET/CT performed the worst in comparison to all other functional imaging modalities.
tended towards significanceP = 0.0561.1× alpha
Moreover, post-hoc analysis revealed that concurrent visual feedback significantly increased SP n (310) compared to both standing with eyes open (SP n = 259: t (17) = 2.41, P < 0.05) and standing with eyes closed (SP n = 243: t (17) = 2.49, P < 0.05). As can be seen in Table 1 , the main effects of group and condition were both significant for sample entropy, while the group by condition interaction tended towards significance ( P = 0.056).