Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline non-significant”

435 sentences · 435 papers · 642 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline non-significantP =0.0460.9× alpha
With this adjustment, two comparisons that were significant without adjustment became borderline non-significant ( Table 3 , adjusted critical P =0.046 versus actual P =0.05 comparing maximal net power at 26°C between char versus salmon acclimated to 6°C; and adjusted critical P =0.045 versus actual P =0.046 comparing maximal net power at 2°C between char acclimated to 6 versus 15°C).
borderline non-significantP = 0.0501.0× alpha
Five studies evaluated cranial radiation therapy (CRT) as a risk factor for MetS, with three case–control studies showed a borderline non-significant association (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.00–3.20, P = 0.050), while cohort studies identified it as a significant risk factor (RR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.22–2.41, P = 0.002).
borderline non-significantP = 0.0501.0× alpha
The full regressions (Model IV) demonstrate that, with each doubling of WSS at Day 1, the fistula vein had a 10% greater increase in lumen area from Day 1 to Week 2 (P < 0.001) and a 9% greater increase from Day 1 to Week 6 (P < 0.001), but only a borderline non-significant 3% greater increase from Week 2 to Week 6 (P = 0.050).
borderline non-significantp = 0.051.0× alpha
However, in a sample of toddlers and preschoolers ( n = 100; mean age 3 years), Kuzik and Carson (2016) [ 9 ] found that time spent in 1–4-minute SED bouts was significantly associated with BMI z-scores in unadjusted analyses, but borderline non-significant ( p = 0.05) after adjusting for child age, sex and parental education.
borderline non-significantp = 0.051.0× alpha
An association was observed with male gender (OR = 2.37; 95%CI 1.07–5.25; p = 0.03), older age which is borderline non-significant for the group 35–44 years (OR = 2.41; 95%CI 0.99–5.88; p = 0.05) and significant for the group 45–60 years (OR = 3.17; 95%CI 1.18–8.50; p = 0.02) and smoking (OR = 3.35; 95%CI 1.17–9.60; p = 0.02).
borderline non-significantp = 0.051.0× alpha
Despite being within normal, irrespectively of gender, HCT percentage was significantly higher in the S group than in the NS group (48.10% versus 46.85%, p = 0.03) while RBC and HBG were borderline non-significant among these subgroups ( p = 0.05 and p = 0.07, respectively; Table 2 ).
borderline non-significantp > 0.051.0× alpha
Liver biochemical markers demonstrated comparability, with gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) showing borderline non-significant differences (both p > 0.05), while alanine aminotransferase (ALT) revealed a significant difference ( p = 0.004).