Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Within-group longitudinal analyses across 2 time points (by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) confirmed stable over time TNF-α levels in the evolocumab group (all p > 0.1), whereas in the control group a borderline significant increase was observed at 72 h vs. baseline ( p = 0.053) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
at the limit of significancep = 0.0531.1× alphagold
TAPSE/PASP remained significantly associated with a high risk of events using Cox univariate analysis (HR: 0.046; 95% CI [0.004–0.45], p = 0.009) but at the limit of significance in the clinical multivariate model (HR: 0.045; 95% CI [0.001–1.02], p = 0.053).
showed a trendp = 0.0531.1× alpha
Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, and level of obstruction, secretory obstruction (vs structural obstruction) showed a trend toward lower failure risk in the secretory group compared with the structural group (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.077–1.015; p = 0.053) ( Table 3 ; Supplementary Figure S1 ). 4.
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
For both models, male patients had lower GDS scores than female patients (β = −1.98, p < 0.01—first model; β = −1.93, p = 0.003—second model); there were no significant effects for education levels, and pension had a negative association with GDS scores, which was marginally significant (β = −0.0005, p = 0.053).
approaching significancep = 0.05301.1× alphagold
Factors Affecting the Risk of Malnutrition According to SGA Scale In the group diagnosed with non-squamous cell carcinoma, there was a 6.67-fold lower risk of moderate and severe malnutrition (SGA) approaching significance (OR = 0.15; p = 0.0530).
a trend towards significancep = 0.05311.1× alpha
No significant differences in the firing rate between groups after FDR correction for multiple comparisons were found, although DEX and REMI, and REMI in combination with CLONI showed a trend towards significance ( t (209) = 2.64, p = 0.0531; t (269) = 2.28, p = 0.0695).