“at the limit of significance”

The mean PI values were statistically significantly superior or at the limit of significance in epithelioid and osteoblastic osteosarcomas, compared with fibroblastic and central low-grade ones, both for Ki67 ( p <0.001, ANOVA test), cyclin D1 ( p =0.070, ANOVA test) and p53 ( p =0.010, ANOVA test) (Table 2 ).

Under the low ionic strength condition, after 63 days, differences between untreated and sodium periodate-treated saliva samples appeared at the limit of significance (paired sample t -test, p < 0.0021).

While the other significant difference, albeit at the limit of significance (p<.005) between the two groups of wards is the one referring to "Medicines not available when needed" and contrary to the other two significant differences, the highest measure was in the wards with HCA.

The mean ± SD of the differences in the BI recovery points measured with the two smooth tests of -1.86 ± 4.69 PD ( Fig 5B ) were at the limit of significance considering the adjusted significance level ( t (48) = -2.78, p = 0.008, Cohen’s d = 0.39).

Complete remission rate was superior at the limit of significance ( P = .01) for patients who would have been able to use standard doxorubicin (76%) vs patients who would not have used doxorubicin (69%).

The Egger’s regression has a p value at the limit of significance ( t = 2.49, df = 71, p = .0152).

Moreover, the d2-OID + VD 3 treatment was associated with the highest decrease, although at the limit of significance, compared with the d2-OID treatment (p = 0.02) and the VD3 treatment (p = 0.051) (Fig. 6 ).

On the other hand, ciliary activity was apparently preserved in both groups challenged with IBVPR03 as the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was at the limit of significance (median scores from VAC/PR03 and NONVAC/PR03 groups were 8 and 9, respectively) ( P = 0.04).

The difference of the human blood indices was at the limit of significance between the two sprayed areas (χ2 = 4.1245, df = 1, P = 0.04), vector populations being slightly more anthropophilic in the area with two rounds of IRS compared to the other area sprayed once.

The only exceptions appeared with pinch after normalization of the data to BJ (although at the limit of significance, p = 0.043, z = 2.78); 4.

The group that underwent a single level en bloc resection consistently showed an increase in EQ-5D-3L index score from baseline at 12 months and also at the limit of significance at 24 months (0.120 [0.003; 0.247], p=0.045 and 0.138 [-0.005; 0.281], p=0.059, respectively).

The species are not clearly differentiated with the chloroplastidial marker, where the coefficient of fixation between species was much lower than that between populations and was at the limit of significance ( F CT = 0.31, P = 0.045; Table 2 ).

This sensitive signature score was also more significantly enriched in monocytes expressing a high OXPHOS score, compared to the refractory signature score, which was at the limit of significance when comparing monocytes with high versus low OXPHOS status in the Cassetta cohort ( P = 0.045; Figure 6 f).

This trend overtime was confirmed after adjusting for the presence of physical inactivity, although at the limit of significance (at month 12, P = 0.046 and at month 24, P = 0.059, respectively).

was recorded in only one sample of SNOW and five samples of ICE, with a p-value at the limit of significance ( P = 0.046), indicating that this result has to be interpreted with caution (Fig. 5 a and b and Table S6).

Though at the limit of significance (p = 0.046), deep deletion of SIRT6 tends to co-occur with PIK3CA amplification/activating mutations (Fig.

Age also correlated with myocardial fibrosis, but at the limit of significance ( P = 0.048); no significant correlation with cardiovascular co‐morbidities was recorded ( Table 5 A ).

Despite the lack of differences, a linear effect was observed at the limit of significance ( p = 0.048).

Finally, the variation in Clavien–Dindo classification was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.048), with the greatest fluctuations in group I, group II, and group IVa ( Table 1 ).

5 a,c), p53 and hScrib levels in the MG132/m‐treated group were also significantly greater than those in MG132‐treated group, although the difference in p53 intensity between free MG132 and MG132/m was at the limit of significance ( P = 0.048).

For the elasticity modulus, the p -value was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0482). 3.2.1.

In a randomized trial, its prophylactic administration in a pediatric population resulted in decreased SOS incidence, from 20% to 12%, although the P values were just at the limit of significance ( Z test for competing risk analysis P = 0.0488; log-rank test P = 0.0507) ( 10 , 11 ).

Its influence appears to be stronger for nonusers but only at the limit of significance ( P = .049).

Although statistical analysis has indicated that these differences are significant, they were at the limit of significance ( p = 0.049).

In analog experiments, the difference of the noncoated granule labeling between 5 and 90 rain was at the limit of significance (P < 0.05).