Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

The near-significant trends observed—slightly lower hemoglobin ( p = 0.053) and slightly lower corrected calcium ( p = 0.075) in fallers—may reflect potential associations that did not reach statistical significance in this sample and are consistent with prior studies in which anemia and subtle disturbances in calcium homeostasis have been reported to be associated with impaired muscle strength, balance instability, and falls [ 39 , 40 ].
Although we noted a trend toward significance in concerns regarding the parental role, with scores of 14.65 ± 3.65 in the conventional group and 13.75 ± 3.65 in the MBCT group ( t = 1.948, P = 0.053), the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Regarding the HFHL, the positive correlations observed in the Q2 and Q3 of NHR did not reach statistical significance (Q2: OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.20; Q3: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.45), and Q4 could be considered as marginally significant (Q4: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, p = 0.054).
For 30-day readmission, a negative correlation was observed (Spearman’s ρ = -0.158), with the result approaching significance (p = 0.054), implying a possible trend toward fewer readmissions in those with a history of COVID-19, though this did not reach statistical significance.