“a marginal trend”

Although the mutations were likely to be located in the middle or downstream region of the RBP binding sites, the distance between the mutations and the start sites of RBP binding sites showed a marginal trend of negative correlation with the functional impact of these mutations (R = ‐0.02; P = 2.50e‐14).

When both individualistic and communal phrases are included in a regression equation predicting year, only individualistic phrases are significant, though communal phrases showed a marginal trend (Beta = .71, p <.001; for communal phrases, Beta = .23, p = .06).

Breaking down the total antibiotic consumption to each of the study antibiotics and antibiotic groups, a marginal trend ( P -values for slope), suggesting correlation with CDI incidence, was seen for carbapenems (IRR 1.25, 95% CI (1.11, 1.42), P =0.003), ceftriaxone (IRR 1.14 (1.02, 1.28), P =0.04), cefepime (IRR 1.10 (1.05, 1.15, P <0.001), macrolides (IRR 1.24 (1.14, 1.35), P <0.001) and piperacillin/tazobactam (IRR 1.09 (1.02, 1.17), P =0.03) ( Figure S3 ).

Other Drug Use In individual biomarker models controlling for other drug use, the above results were unchanged, except that the positive association of EndoCAb with Trails A became a marginal trend ( p = 0.008). 3.2.3.

Frequentist analysis showed a significant phase effect for CoPpi (F(1.94, 7.76) = 10.93, p = 0.006, ηp 2 = 0.732) and a marginal trend from CoPpd (F(1.97, 7.88) = 7.08, p = 0.014, ηp 2 = 0.639).

The relative abundance of the genus Bilophilia was significantly lower in the lower Q group than in the upper Q group (CE, 0.0045; P = 0.004; q = 0.043) and showed a marginal trend toward decrease compared with the middle 2Q group (CE, 0.0034; P = 0.014; q = 0.098; Fig. 5B ).

While the difference did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction, a marginal trend towards better survival was observed in the CTD-UIP group compared to the asbestosis-UIP group ( p = 0.017).

In the correlation analysis between clinical characteristics, patients with an earlier onset of symptoms had a marginal trend with slow disease progression (r=0.367, p =0.020) ( Fig. 2B ).

S6 A –6 F ) This observation was supported by a marginal trend toward enrichment for poly-phosphate inositol related phosphatases ( p = 0.02, FDR = 18%).

ACWR TD W3 showed a trend toward an association with injury risk (χ 2 (1) = 5.24, p = 0.022; R 2 McF = 0.094; AUC = 0.675; OR = 236.33, 95% CI [0.91, 61,385.02], p = 0.054), while ACWR TD W4 also demonstrated a marginal trend ( p = 0.076; AUC = 0.665).

In this model, age emerged as a significant predictor (β = 0.206, p = 0.020), with older participants reporting higher autonomic reactivity, while gender showed a marginal trend (β = −0.194, p = 0.028), suggesting that women (coded as 0) exhibited higher BPQ scores than men (coded as 1).

There was a marginal trend for an interaction between stimulus type and age group, F (2, 82) = 3.6, p = .03, η 2 = .08.

For WT mice only, the effect of treatment appeared to have a marginal trend toward a decrease in size (− 3.4%, p < 0.03, q < 0.16).

Although this was only a marginal trend (p < 0.03) in this small cohort, this phenomenon is notable.

Despite the lack of formal significance, a marginal trend was observed (one-tailed p = 0.035).

However, in MEDAS, there was a marginal trend indicating that participants with higher body fat were less likely to adhere to the Mediterranean diet (OR = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.697–0.989, p = 0.038).

Regarding fear stimuli, we found a significant negative correlation for posture ( r = −0.754, p < 0.01), and after correction for multiple comparisons, only a marginal trend was retrievable for the IAPS stimuli ( r = −0.292, p = 0.04).

Pooled data from the LACE meta-analysis demonstrate a marginal trend toward survival using cisplatin/vinorelbine compared with other cisplatin combinations ( p = 0.04).

Medication status showed a nominally significant association with the degree centrality HD of the fusiform (Cohen’s d = −0.22, unadjusted p = 0.04), and a marginal trend with fusiform nodal global efficiency HD (Cohen’s d = −0.19, unadjusted p = 0.06).

1b ), with a marginal trend when the data were nested per subject ( p = 0.0435/Cohen’s d = 0.6225, Fig. 1c ).

In this case, the mean grain size presented a marginal trend towards a significant difference among the three species (Kruskal-Wallis H = 6.23, p = 0.044), whereas the observed differences in the sorting of the grains and the Qz content were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis H = 3.84, p = 0.146 and H = 4.97, p = 0.083, respectively).

However, the comparison between General Education Bachelor's and Master's Degree showed a marginal trend ( p = 0.045, adjusted p = 0.272, r = 0.348), which may warrant further investigation in studies with larger sample sizes.

There was a trend of increasing frequency of fibrosis (> 30%) with decreasing nodule echogenicity ( p < 0.001) and a marginal trend of increasing frequency of lymphoid infiltration (> 30%) with decreasing nodule echogenicity ( p = 0.048).

Neither male nor female authors significantly decreased their representation of male non-human characters, but when books targeted towards teens were excluded from this analysis, we found a significant trend towards parity for male authors ( B = -0.02, Z = -1.96, p = 0.0499, OR = 0.98, 95% CI = [0.96, 0.99]) and a marginal trend for female authors ( B = -0.02, Z = -1.77 p = 0.077, OR = 0.98, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.00]).

In contrast, CT showed a marginal trend toward reducing arterial stiffness (SMD = − 0.39, 95% CI: − 0.79 to 0.00, P = 0.05), although the evidence was not sufficiently robust to support a clear effect (Fig. 3 ).