Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = .0521.0× alphagold
Participants were more likely to provide accept evidence explanations for agents than explain away explanations ( β = 1.48, p < .001) and pattern explanations (marginally significant: β = 0.79, p = .052), compared to objects, and they were less likely to provide explain away explanations for agents than other explanations, compared to objects ( β = -0.95, p = .005).
at the limit of significancep = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The two cohorts differed statistically based on the genotype distributions (χ 2 = 13.918; p = 0.0009 Fisher’s exact test) and allele frequencies of TAS1R3 SNPs (χ 2 = 13.776; p = 0.0010 Fisher’s exact test), the diplotype distributions (χ 2 = 8.248; p = 0.0181; Fisher’s exact test) and haplotype frequencies of TAS2R38 SNPs (χ 2 = 8.566; p = 0.0138; Fisher’s exact test), and the genotype distributions of CD36 SNP (χ 2 = 6.875; p = 0.032; Fisher’s exact test), while the allele frequencies for this locus was at the limit of significance (χ 2 = 5.887; p = 0.052; Fisher’s exact test).
nearly significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Total energy intake decreased significantly in the intervention group by 32.4% (-757.23 ± 663.27 kcal, P < 0.001), while the control group had a less pronounced reduction of 16.7% (-380.88 ± 573.68 kcal, P = 0.055), with a nearly significant between-group difference ( P = 0.052).
marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The usual frequency of working from home was a marginally significant cross-level moderator of the path between self-goal setting and work engagement (estimate = ˗0.005, SD = 0.003, p = 0.052), and a significant cross-level moderator of the path between self-reward and work engagement (estimate = ˗0.010, SD = 0.003, p < 0.001), self-punishment and work engagement (estimate = ˗0.005, SD = 0.003, p < 0.05), and visualization of successful performance and work engagement (estimate = ˗0.008, SD = 0.003, p < 0.01).