Excerpts

These simulations were carried out for response variables that showed marginally non-significant (p < 0.2) differences between treatments.

Variables in the multivariate logistic analysis were selected based on variables which were marginally significant with p <0.20 in univariate logistic analysis.

Variables that were statistically significant or had a trend towards significance (p <0.2) in univariate analysis or were of clinical importance were included in the multivariate analysis.

During breeding years, though there was a decreasing trend, weight did not decrease significantly with Julian date (n = 43; β = -0.05 ± 0.04, p = 0.2).

There was a decreasing trend ( p -value = 0.20) of apoptosis in cells treated with QVD-OPH compared to untreated cells, with a decrease in the mean percentage of apoptotic cells by 0.23% (pEGFP) and 2.42% (pEGFP-E1), thus suggesting that apoptosis plays only a part of HPV16 E1-mediated cell death.

5A ), while the suppressive capacity of Tregs on proliferation showed a trend with demethylation (r = 0.4, p = 0.2, Fig. 5B , n = 13).

Variables in the multivariate analysis were selected based on variables which were marginally significant with P<0.20 in univariate analysis.

Notably, only our all-season mediation models showed marginally statistically significant (p-value < 0.2) indirect effects, which may be a reflection of limited power for our season-stratified models.

Genetic variants identified as approaching significance (using the standard p<0.20 [ 17 ]) were characterized as having the potential to predict weight change, and were included with demographic characteristics in subsequent regression modelling for aim 2.

Birth history and demographic factors such as sex, disability and income were included to model and dietary habits were selected based on backward selection with at least marginal significance (p<0.2) on univariate analysis.

Significant and marginally significant linear and polynomial regressions are shown for each enzyme and each soil characteristic, P <0.2.

While the tests for binding-coercion (p = .055) and responsibility ratings–free choice (p = .051) approached significance, the difference scores free choice-coercion used in the following correlation analyses were normally distributed for both measures (p = .2).

We conducted further statistical analysis as you suggested, adjusting the regression model on two variables which were close to significance in the univariate analysis with p<0.2 : septic shock and norepinephrine infusion.

We evaluated several clinical variables and their influence on CD8 + T-cell reconstitution, and none of them correlated significantly with faster CD8 + T-cell reconstitution at the time point of 28 days post-transplant, although there was a slight trend towards faster CD8 + T-cell recovery in patients with higher CD34 + -cell dose in the graft (P = 0.20).

Although this fell short of significance when compared to Population Controls (p = 0.20), it would be the expected trend if S377G played a causative role in PFO at the severe end of the spectrum.

Combinational treatment showed significance in comparison to control by week five (p = 0.029), curcumin alone showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.20), and NSC treatment showed no significance (p = 0.55).

Comparing the interval from PrTu diagnosis to LiMe between the high and low miRNA-21 expression group showed a trend towards faster development of LiMe (p = 0.20; Fig 2b ) with higher miRNA-21 levels in the PrTu.

The variables found to significantly associate ( p< 0.05) with outcomes variables or marginally significant ( p< 0.20) in the univariate analysis, or that had a clinical relevance were selected in the multivariate model.

The mutant 6.7.1 showed a favorable trend towards lower induction of proliferation (P<0.2), whereas 11.5.2 showed proliferation comparable to rFel d 1.

4A right panel ), while no other main effects or interactions approached significance (F≤1.8, p≥0.20).

The LA group showed a trend toward LVEDV decrease compared with both the I/R+V group (1.183±0.103 vs 1.359±0.075 ml, P = 0.206) and the wortmannin-treated group (1.183±0.103 vs 1.342±0.076 ml, P = 0.251) ( Figure 4d ), however, no statistical significance was observed.

In Model 1, which includes age and family history of BC as adjustment variables, sitting >2-≤3h/d shows a statistically significant relationship (OR = 1.29 (1.01–1.66), p-value = 0.044), being the rest of categories nearly significant (>3-≤5 h/d: OR = 1.18 (0.91–1.53), p-value = 0.206; >5 h/d: OR = 1.21 (0.93–1.57), p-value = 0.156).

The primary analysis showed no statistically significant effect, but a positive trend was observed (p = 0.206; 95%-CI = -0.084; 0.384).

NS indicates difference between sAPPα immunodepleted and control groups were not significantly significant (t(4) = 1.49, p = 0.21).

The reduction in the early vaccination period was highly significant for all PCV7 serotypes except for serotype 18C (p = 0.21).