“marginally statistically significant”

On the contrary, vaccination against influenza was not associated with a decrease in the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in four studies [ 22 , 29 , 30 , 38 ] including 1 711 800 vaccinated and 8 197 135 controls, whilst a significant decrease in other forms of dementia was reported in three studies [ 28 , 30 , 38 ] (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.69–0.99; P = .049), even if marginally statistically significant, and for vascular dementia (RR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.47–0.75; P < .0001; I 2 = 0%).

Also, females with fatigue were younger that those without it, though it was only marginally statistically significant in the non-CWP group: 57.7 ± 11.1 vs 60.8 ± 10.2 years (p = 5 × 10 − 4 ) with CWP and 50.4 ± 15.5 vs 52.5 ± 14.8 years (p = 0.060) in those without CWP.

Because this modest reduction was only marginally statistically significant ( p value ~ 0.001), we concluded that the insertion of HA tag into L2 did not significantly affect viral genome amplification.

Likewise, EPC frequencies were increased in IPF and SSc-ILD − patients when compared to HC, but in the latter case it was marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.057, respectively) ( Figure 1 ).

The UK based European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial after a median follow-up of 11 years showed an increased incidence and a 21% relative reduction in risk of death that was only marginally statistically significant at p = 0.001 [ 35 ].

The disease was statistically significantly associated with other chronic DM complications such as: i) peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.001), however, the association was only marginally statistically significant when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (logistic regression adjusted OR 1.70 95% CI 0.90–3.21); ii) coronary artery disease (p = 0.002), but again was only marginally statistically significant when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (adjusted OR 1.96 95% CI 0.91–4.22); and, iii) peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.009), however, this effect disappeared when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (Table 5 ).

In contrast, associations between SXL and CstF64, SXL and the hnRNP core, and PSI and the hnRNP core were marginally statistically significant in the G test but were highly significant (P < 0.005) in all three Monte Carlo simulations, even when heterogeneity in composition and overlap between the sites were accounted for.

Although mir-83 ( n4638 ) ; mir-34 ( gk437 ) worms raised at 20° appeared to have a slightly shortened lifespan compared to N2 , the difference was only marginally statistically significant ( Figure 7A , *** P ≤ 0.005, **0.005 < P ≤ 0.01, *0.01 < P ≤ 0.05, unpaired t -test).

While these findings were marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.005), they appeared very weak compared to kidney and liver diseases (Fig. 3 A—no clear separation of red and blue above or below the zero line in brain, unlike in the liver).

Based on our primary AUC analysis, the only cytokine that differed significantly as a function of anesthetic approach was IL-6, and the increase was only marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.006 with an α threshold of 0.01 because of multiple comparisons).

Although, we should be cautious due to the small sample size and the case of marginally statistically significant differences when correcting the significance level at p = 0.007 to avoid Type-1 errors, these gender differences may be due to the parasympathetic withdrawal response during the AG training when compared to the standing condition.

The same pattern was evident for the subgroup of reviews with marginally statistically significant heterogeneity (P-value between 0.05 and 0.10, P = 0.007, Fisher's exact test).

In the 6-12 years age group: Statistical correlation showed a highly significant increase in the distance of mental foramen from base of mandible in female patients ( P < 0.01), and a marginally statistically significant increase in the mean distance of mental foramen from reference line in the female patients ( P < 0.05) when compared with the male patients.

Unlike the HFIAS score, which was not statically significant, a comparison of the two groups revealed marginally statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences in the prevalence of food insecurity across time by region of origin of households between the two groups.

The fixed effect of the interaction of age and time in energy intake and weight was statistically or marginally statistically significant both in men (p<0.01) and in women (p<0.06).

Of the six jargon categories, mean % Thought Understood was lower for Molecular terms than all other terms ( n of Molecular terms = 23, n of other terms = 49, Kruskal-Wallis test χ 2 = 10.9, p < 0.008) and higher, though marginally statistically significant, for Information terms than for all other terms ( n of Information terms = 19, n other terms = 53, Kruskal-Wallis test χ 2 = 6.47, p = 0.01; Figure 2 and Supplemental Table S2).

Based on our sensitivity analysis results of the knee injections only data with the participants that received both TH and TA removed, the TH group had a longer relapse time relative to the TA group in the unadjusted and adjusted models, but the HR in the adjusted model was marginally statistically significant (unadjusted HR = 0.102, 95% CI (0.017, 0.582), p value < 0.010; adjusted HR = 0.315, 95% CI (0.099, 1.004), p value = 0.051).

Also, a slightly increased expression of hTERT (1.15-fold increase) was observed in TatHA treated HCC1599 cells versus the E132/TatHA protein, but this difference was only marginally statistically significant (p < 0.0102) (Figure 3 ).

6f ), which is, however, only marginally statistically significant (HR = 3.26, P -value = 0.012, log-rank test).

In linear regression analysis, ozone effects on nitrotyrosine were marginally statistically significant (p = 0.017).

(4) The height of the lateral masses was larger on the right side and in male subjects; however, the difference was only marginally statistically significant ( p =0.02).

However, upon conducting multiple comparison tests, we found only one marginally statistically significant effect, such that the scientific evidence condition decreased intentions to wear a mask ( mean difference = −0.17, 95% CI [−0.31, −0.03], p = .02); which was in the opposite direction of our hypothesis.

Similar analyses using a 699-bp fragment containing only SNP rs3738668 (A and C alleles; Figure 1C ) revealed no overall modulation of MFSD2A promoter activity, as indicated by luciferase values, except for a marginally statistically significant effect only in Hek293T cells (P = 0.022).

In the linear regression analysis examining the association between TIBC and BMI, a marginally statistically significant positive association was observed ( β = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02; p = 0.022).

In situ, hybridization labelling for IFN-γ and IL-17A in the placenta also showed a great proportion of zeros with marginally statistically significant effects of the group on the non-zero part of each model (IFN-γ p = 0.022 and IL-17A p = 0.032), though the only significant difference between the groups was a higher non-zero response in the DL group than the NC group for IFN-γ (es = 1.41, p = 0.018) ( Figure 7 and Figure S5 ). 3.10.