showed a trendp < 0.09
frutescens they showed a trend (i.e., p < 0.09) to produce nearly 50% less TNF-α following an injection of E . coli endotoxin (i.e., LPS).
frutescens they showed a trend (i.e., p < 0.09) to produce nearly 50% less TNF-α following an injection of E . coli endotoxin (i.e., LPS).
regilla decreased within all treatments between day 8 and 15; this negative change in infection load was significant in the intermediate treatment (Welch’s t-test t 8 = 3.568; p = 0.004) and was marginally significant in the low inoculation dose treatment (Welch’s t-test t 12 = 2.22; p = 0.09).
DIC fluxes tended to increase with oyster biomass, but were only marginally significant (p = 0.09, R 2 = 0.31; Fig 4B ).
We found a marginally significant negative geographic distance decay of similarity (1- D B ; Mantel r = −0.29, p < 0.09) ( Fig 4A ).
We suggest this may be the case for the trait of extractable soil aluminum in the current study, as it had a K statistic of less than unity (K = 0.80 with marginal significance of p = 0.09; Table 2 ) and node-specific results from the AOT showed a number of significant nodes associated with high aluminum.
The killing of D6-iPSC2 cells by NK cells of donor 5 appeared also to be reduced but only at borderline significance (panel D in S10 Fig ) (P = 0.09, t -test).
However, earlier analysis of the chow-fed animals found that CRHR2 exhibited an elevated trend when the same data was normalized by GAPDH ( t [ 5 ] = 2.008; p = 0.09).
HCV RF+ donors bulk B cells also showed a trend towards decreased responsiveness to TLR9 agonist in comparison to HCV RF- donors(p = 0.09).
1.5%; p<0.001), which is consistent with the results of the SYNTAX trial, showing a significant trend toward higher incidence of stroke in surgical patients (3.7% vs 2.4%; p = 0.09) [ 17 ].
Marginally significant correlations were observed in susceptibility with duration of the infectious period ( r s = 0.26, p = 0.09; Fig. 3A ) and with mortality ( r s = −0.29, p = 0.07; Fig. 3B ).
The cut-point for Spry2 expression were calculated as described in the Materials and Methods , such that as well as showing high significance for difference in survival (p = 0.0069; Figure 5B ), the cutpoint for Spry2 expression also maintained near significance with Monte Carlo simulations (p = 0.09) and correction for type I error (Miller-Seigmund p value = 0.12).
2E ; Student's t -test, ** P <0.01), while demyelination was not significantly reduced, even if it showed a trend to decrease in IP7e-treated EAE mice ( Fig. 2F ; Student's t -test, P = 0.09).
The only relationship that approached significance was that between the number of HTML views of the blog post and PDF downloads (p = 0.09).
There was a tendency for readers to have longer reading times on pseudowords in the incongruent condition than pseudowords in the balanced condition; the effect was marginally significant for first fixation duration (mean difference = 9ms, b = -0.02, SE = 0.01, t = -1.78, p = 0.09) and gaze duration (mean difference = 21ms, b = -0.04, SE = 0.03, t = -1.73, p = 0.09), and significant for total fixation time (mean difference = 58ms, b = -0.08, SE = 0.04, t = -1.99, p < 0.05).
Carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2) > 55 mmHg was protective and near to statistical significance (p = 0.09).
Results Pre-registered analysis To address our pre-registered hypothesis ( https://osf.io/ht3yn ), we conducted a chi-square test and found a marginally significant difference in attendance rate between the two conditions [ X 2 (1,263) = 2.86, p = .09].
Repeated-measures ANOVA yielded a marginally significant main effect of Group (F(1,32) = 2.9; p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.09) and significant main effects of Statement (F(1,32) = 34.4; p<0.0001, η p 2 = 0.51) and Occupation (F(1,32) = 22.6; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.41).
This difference did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.09), though we note that our sample size for this comparison is smaller than some previous studies and a comparable sample size to previous studies may have rendered an effect of this size statistically significant.
The program showed a marginally statistically significant effect on K6 (t = −1.72, p = 0.09) and efficacy of problem-solving (t = 1.82, p = 0.07).
Compared to acute controls, NK1R binding was significantly reduced in SIDS cases in the NTS (p = 0.04), DAO (p = 0.01) and MAO (p = 0.03) ( Fig 3A ) and significantly reduced in the DAO (p = 0.01) and MAO (p = 0.03) with borderline significance in the PIO (p = 0.09) when compared to all controls combined (acute, chronic and hypoxic) ( Fig 3B ).
As per previous investigations of visual performance fields [5] , [8] , we first conducted a 2 (Head Posture) * 2 (Distractor Orientation) * 8 (Target Location) omnibus ANOVA on these transformed values averaged over participants, which confirmed main effects of Head Posture ( F (1,3) = 13.474, MSE = .139, p = .035, η 2 = .818), and Location ( F (7,21) = 11.521, MSE = .427, p <.001, η 2 = .793), but only a marginal trend for the main effect of Distractor Orientation ( F (1,3) = 6.104, MSE = .841, p = .09, η 2 = .670).
ervi ( F 1,21 = 35.53, P < 0.0001, Fig 2A ) and moderately significant non-consumptive suppression by the non-enemy A . colemani ( F 1,21 = 3.06, P = 0.09, Fig 2A ).
The overall ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Group ( F (1,32) = 2.79, p = .09, η 2 = .08), with the HMA group showing a greater positivity (e.g., at Cz mean = .80 μV, SEM = .16) than the LMA one (mean = .50 μV, SEM = .10).
206±16%, n = 4; p = 0.0049) in the CPT-11 group, although after one week there was only a trend towards significance between the treatment and the control group (127±7%, n = 7 and 147±8%, n = 7; p = 0.09).
The difference in correlations between groups approached significance, F = 2.89, p = .09.