Excerpts

Similarly, the difference in mean BMI of the Δ TTTCT deletion positive relative to the deletion negative East Asian individuals was greater in females than in males ( Table 2 ) and the difference between the genotypes was marginally significant in females but not in males (p = 0.07 for females versus p = 0.45 for males, t test).

The Modality factor was close to significance (F[ 1 , 20 ] = 3.81, p < 0.07).

saccharum (t 2344 = 1.84, marginally significant at p = 0.07; Fig 3A ).

At the age of 21 days we did not detect statistical differences in testosterone levels between MUN and control males or between MUN and control females, although there was a tendency towards higher levels in MUN males ( Fig 9 ) and the interaction between sex and fetal nutrition was near statistical significance (p = 0.07, Table 2 ).

The overall warming effects were marginally significant on LFC ( p = 0.07, Table 1 ) but insignificant on LFN ( p = 0.16, Table 1 ).

When age-standardized scores on the face recognition task were correlated with percentage of viewing times on the interest areas, the only significant association was with the sum of core features in the ASD group, r (11) = 0.64, p = 0.03, and this was marginally significant in the TD group, r (11) = 0.57, p = 0.07.

This effect was only marginally significant for the P50 amplitude (F(1,18)=3.85, p=0.07).

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry A trend towards a higher percentage of muscle fibres containing internalised nuclei in the homozygous and heterozygous horses was observed when compared to the control horses and the difference between the 3 groups approached significance (p = 0.07) ( figure 1a ).

The atazanavir C 12 was higher (median, 0.85 mg/L; range, 0.11–1.75) in patients with incident stones compared with patients without stones (median, 0.66 mg/L; range, 0.01–5.84), but the difference was of borderline significance ( P = 0.07).

The performance on training trials was very similar between the two groups (t(18) = 1.51, p = 0.15), however the difference in performance on test trials was marginally significant (t(18) = 1.87, p = 0.07).

We nevertheless observed a marginally significant correlation between days to flowering and silique number within the experimental populations of planting 3 (Spearman r = 0.29, p = 0.07).

The only exception was executive function delay/impairment at age 6 which was reduced to marginal significance (mild white matter abnormality OR = 2.8, moderate-to-severe white matter abnormality OR = 5.3, p = .07).

Marginally significant effects of the interaction was also reported for two additional combinations: Sch-58261+ Merck 22 (p = 0.07) and Tozadenant + Radiprodil (p = 0.06).

Post-hoc comparisons achieved an almost significant effect (p = 0.07) of the drug in the time spent by animals in exploring the light compartment, when compared to vehicle administered animals.

-How might confounding variables may shift results showing survival analysis results demonstratinhg a near-significant difference in log-rank tests for DTR vs. non-DTR (p=0.07), especially given that logistic regression finds DTR to be a significant independent predictor. -Given the relatively advanced age and high comorbidity burden, do you have severity-of-illness scores (e.g., APACHE II, SOFA on admission)?

However, these differences only reached borderline significance (p = 0.07 and p = 0.06, respectively).

Treatment with HSP60 peptide 180-188 alone showed a trend towards reduction of arthritis, without achievement of statistically significant differences (Day 23 p = 0.07, AUC p = 0.26 vs. no treatment).

MB210B had a memory index close to significance (p = 0.07).

However, these increases were only marginally significant (p = 0.070).

However, under kernel approach, the relationship between the proportion of species pairs with high trait overlap with species richness was only marginally significant for leaf size (r 2 = 0.14, p-value = 0.07 for leaf size, S6E Fig ) and none relationship was observed for SLA ( S6F Fig ).

For both FAFV and Bacteroidetes, there was a clear trend towards a higher load in patients that underwent biliary drainage (6093.8 vs 2234.2 p = 0.070, 59.2 vs 27.6, p = 0.070 respectively), but it did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 2B ).

When this AMF was excluded from the analysis, a comparable marginally significant effect of shoot P GCA on 14 C:*P (F 1,15.4 = 3.9, P = 0.07) was found in species pool 2.

The difference in chitotriosidase activity showed a trend ( p = 0.07).

Crucially, this analysis revealed that, overall, the stress group showed marginally greater learning of probability-based information than the control group (as indicated by the marginally significant GROUP × PROBABILITY interaction, F (1, 51) = 3.45, p = .07, η 2 p = .06; stress group: M random high = 96.34%, M random low = 101.61%, standardized learning score: M = 5.27%; control group: M random high = 97.04%, M random low = 100.89%, standardized learning score: M = 3.85%, see Fig 4 ; for a figure with individual data points, see S5 Fig in S1 File ).

Nestbox-oriented song rate The two groups sang at the same rate before treatment (p = 0.57) increasing song rate over time (time, F (2,108) = 19.66, p<0.0001) with a nearly significant treatment×time interaction (F (2,108) = 2.79, p = 0.07; treatment, F (1,108) = 1.06, p = 0.31, Fig. 1b ).