Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

close to significanceP = 0.0581.2× alpha
On the contrary, we found a trend towards a more positive correlation between visitation frequencies by honey-bees and native insects with increasing field isolation; the slope of the linear regression between (log) habitat proximity and the correlation coefficient estimated for each field was close to significance (−0.13+0.063, F 1,15 = 4.23, P = 0.058).
marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Notably, in our study the stressor induced a marginally significant increase of REM% in the first 8 th segment of sleep (distressing film: Mean 1.18 min, SD 2.98; neutral film: Mean 0.10 min, SD 0.45; t = 1.97, p = 0.058) and a trend-level shortening of REM latency with increasing emotional impact in LSQR ( r = −.45, p = 0.062).
marginally non-significantp = 0.05871.2× alpha
Hypotension was significantly increased (RR 2.67; 95% CI 1.45–4.92; p = 0.0112; I2 = 0%), with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses yielding stable estimates ranging from RR 2.33 to 2.86, though omitting Laffin 2025 rendered the result marginally non-significant (RR 2.66; 95% CI 0.93–7.56; p = 0.0587).
did not quite achieve significancep = 0.05871.2× alphagold
Assay of whole brain extracts of WT or mutant mice for lysosomal α-L-fucosidase activity showed that the Gnptab −/− mice had a decreased level of this hydrolase that did not quite achieve significance (p = 0.0587) whereas the Gnptg −/− mice had a significant decrease in α-L-fucosidase activity (p = 0.0059) ( Fig. 9C ).
marginally nonsignificantP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
We found a marginally nonsignificant positive relationship between BCI and corticosterone metabolite concentrations in females during incubation ( Fig 6A , F 1, 40 = 3.75, P = 0.059), but not in females ( Fig 6B , F 1,47 = 0.78, P = 0.38) nor males ( Fig 6C , F 1,56 = 0.53, P = 0.46) during nestling feeding (see S4 Table for model details).
close-to-significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
(No hypothesis was made regarding negative affect due to previous conflicting findings) Self-report data indicated that across all participants, self-compassionate imagery had a small-to-medium-size effect on positive affect ( d = 0.40), producing a close-to-significant increase ( t (24) = -1.983, p = .059, 95% CI -5.38 to 0.11) from pre (M = 19.84, SD = 7.31) to post-imagery (M = 22.48, SD = 7.83).