Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a marginal trendp = .0511.0× alphagold
Whereas infants and apes both pointed more frequently towards the other side when the reward was located there (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 45.0, N = 9, p = .004; apes: T + = 59.5, N = 11, p = .018), only infants exhibited a marginal trend to direct more pointing gestures towards the other side when the experimenter was attentive (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 39.0, N = 9, p = .051; apes: T + = 40.0, N = 11, p = .544).
approaching significancep = .0511.0× alphagold
The results indicated that the correlation between responses to the anticipation question and responses to the disappointment question was not statistically significant, but was approaching significance ( r s = 0.091, p = .051, N = 55). 3.3 Experiment 3 We first confirmed that all participants answered all test questions, and that no participants failed to respond correctly (i.e. “Paris”) to the attention check question.
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
When separated by condition, there was a comparable valence effect for the EXP-certain condition (p = 0.90); but there was a marginally significant valence effect for the EXP-uncertain (M (positive) = 4.029, M (negative) = 1.604, p = 0.051) and a significant UNEXP-uncertain (M (positive) = 4.911, M (negative) = −0.042, p < 0.001) conditions, with a larger FRN amplitude observed for negative than positive feedback. 3.2.1.2.
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
We found no evidence that average maternal LG was correlated with novelty scores for competition wins ( r = −0.184, p = 0.694, n = 7), and we found a marginally significant but negative correlation between the average amount of maternal LG and the novelty scores for CORT habituation ( r = −0.559, p = 0.051, n = 11; Fig. 3B ).