Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely significantp = .0290.6× alphagold
Nonetheless, we are cautious in making strong inferences from the total reading data because: i) the observed effect was numerically small in magnitude; ii) only two-thirds of the participants showed this advantage in total reading times; and iii) the effect did not reach the significance level in the item-analysis –note that the effect was barely significant (p = .029) when using a linear mixed model analysis for this comparison; and iv) the effect did not occur for total reading times or gaze durations at the local (word) level.
highly significantP = 0.02920.6× alphaqualifiedgold
However, in line with the results of Experiment 1, we observed a highly significant group difference for signals evoked by the syllable <ma1> in the post-hoc tests (RMS: post-hoc test /ma1/: F (1,25) = 5.35, P = 0.0292, η 2 = 0.15 t (25) = 2.31, P = 0.029; dipole analysis: group : F (1,25) = 4.86, P = 0.0369, η 2 = 0.16; hemisphere : F (1,25) = 5.30, P = 0.030, η 2 = 0.17; group*hemisphere : F (1,25) = 1.67, n.s.).
highly significantp<0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
APPPS1-21 animals showed impaired PPF compared with littermate controls at 80 ms and 160 ms interstimulus interval as shown in post-hoc tests: At the interstimulus interval 80 ms, Yuen's test (t 6.17 = 3.696, p<0.01) showed a highly significant difference between genotypes, and at the interstimulus interval 160 ms Yuen's test (t 5.65 = 3.02, p<0.03) discovered a significant impairment of PPF in the APPPS1-21 mice as well ( fig. 9 ).
near-significantp = .030.6× alphagold
Using this classification, we again found significant or near-significant effects of expectation on delayed memory performance (VMT Completion Time: F 1,71 = 3.92, p = .03, η 2 p = 0.10; VMT Distance Traveled: F 1,71 = 4.31, p = .02, η 2 p = 0.11; VMT Backtracking: F 1,71 = 2.33, p = .11, η 2 p = 0.06; MST correct sequences: F 1,89 = 2.78, p = .07, η 2 p = 0.06).
reached borderline significancep = 0.0300.6× alphagold
The difference between the best p gain and fixed p gain{exc,inh} settings was not significant ( p = 0.324, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), and the small decreased observed in the best p gain{exc,inh} setting relative to the fixed p gain{exc,inh} and best p gain settings reached borderline significance ( p = 0.030 and p = 0.003, respectively, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests).
Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion The fasting plasma insulin concentration, as well as the plasma insulin response during all hyperglycemic clamp steps (+125mg/dL, +300 mg/dL and arginine), were higher after Liposyn infusion (but did not reach statistical significance during the +300 mg/dL step): fasting (2.3±0.7 vs . 4.0±0.7 μIU/ml, p = 0.03); +125mg/dL (time 90-120min: 37±5 vs . 51±7 μIU/ml; p = 0.01); +300mg/dL (time 90-120min: 154±21 vs . 180±26 p = 0.10); and after arginine (428±35 vs . 476±29 uU/ml; p = 0.01) ( Fig 1c and S2 Fig ), indicating the normal physiologic response to the insulin resistance associated with Liposyn infusion.