“barely significant”

The Tau2 value, which was barely significant at 0.0927 (95% CI: 0.0229-1.2682), and the Q statistic (Q = 67.50, df = 3, p < 0.0001) further confirmed significant heterogeneity.

The correlation in the hip moment was barely significant when correcting for multiple comparisons ( p = 0.001).

The difference in the frequency of agreement between PJs and NPJs was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for item 4 (“Groups similar at baseline”) and barely significant ( p = 0.050) for item 8 (“Less than 15% dropouts”).

Overall the two distributions were significantly different ( Figure 6A ; K-S test, p < 0.001), with a barely significant difference in the first few hours of regeneration ( Figure 6B ; K-S test, p = 0.001), and then disappeared ( Figure 6C ; K-S test, p = 0.001) only to become statistically very clear 24 hours after excision ( Figure 6D and 6E ; K-S test, p < 0.001). 3.

At 14a1, the Col allele was over-transmitted by 68% and this difference was highly significant ( p-value = 0.00111), while it was only barely significant ( p-value = 0.0734) for the 14a2 hotspot, probably due to the lower CO number.

By independently comparing the number of lengthening and shortening genes with differential expression changes to those genes without associated expression changes, we observed a higher than expected overlap between genes with both 3′ UTR lengthening and increased expression, and a barely significant overlap between 3′ UTR shortening and decreased expression ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, two-sided Fisher’s exact test, Bonferroni correction).

On the other hand, among genes subjected to Type II regulation, which are predicted to be regulated only at the mRNA degradation level, we only found barely significant enrichments (which did not pass the FDR-requirement), for example, for 'RNA modification' ( p -value = 0.0029), 'protein modification' ( p -value = 0.01) and 'nucleic-acid metabolism' ( p -value = 0.022) (see our supplementary data [ 16 ]).

The interaction between age and time was highly significant for sleeping, eating, and excretion, and barely significant (p = 0.003) for depression ( Fig. 2 ).

Similarly, UbC and MC1 driven expression also showed significantly higher expression when positioned in the sense orientation, although the effect was barely significant (p = 0.006 and p = 0.007, respectively) relative to the 0.006 p-value threshold obtained after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

By contrast, genetic deletion of LARP1 does not enhance the polysomal association of LDHA mRNA ( P = 0.6037, and has only a minor effect on the polysomal distribution of β-actin mRNA (barely significant, P = 0.0078) (Figure 1C ).

Of interest, the variation in read counts between INTS11-KD and control was barely significant over termination sites ( Fig. 4d ; Supplementary Fig. 7d ; P ~1e−2; right box plot).

When the null hypothesis is true (ie, there is no true effect), P values are assumed to follow a uniform distribution: Highly significant effects (eg, P = .01) are as likely as barely significant effects (eg, P = .049).

Of note, serum vitamin C concentrations were significantly lower in the higher weight tertiles ( p < 0.0001), despite a barely significant difference in vitamin C intake between the weight tertiles ( p = 0.01).

There were significant differences between all three groups in the presence of “shortness of breath” (p<0.01), though the difference between the negative and positive groups was barely significant (p<0.01).

As expected, there was no effect for 2D-LRH ( Figure 2B ), the effect was barely significant for 3D-LRH ( R 2 =0.07, P =0.012; Figure 2C ), and most prominent effect was for RA-LRH ( R 2 =0.25, P =1.2×10 −7 ; Figure 2D ), especially for RA-LRH as seen by higher (negative) correlation coefficient (−0.50 versus −0.27) and steeper regression line ( Figure 2C, 2D ).

Our analysis of posterior shroom3 crispant junctions revealed a barely significant (p = 0.015) change in their bulk behavior ( Figure 11B , right).

Gobiodon erythrospilus had barely significant population structure pre‐ and post‐disturbances (AMOVA: F ST = 0.005, p = 0.018).

The Aβ40 finding should also be interpreted cautiously since this initial decline was driven by few individuals and the Aβ40 model was barely significant for CSF ( P = 0.02; Appendix Fig S1 ) and was not significant for plasma ( P = 0.37; Appendix Fig S2 ).

Despite this clear overlap, statistical analysis indicated that the synteny between mouse chromosome 4 loss and the human summary plots was either not significant (ALK-driven pHGG) or barely significant (NTRK2-driven pHGG; P = 0.02), as a result of the small human patient population harboring chromosomal aberrations.

per cent they were only barely significant (p > 0.02).

On univariate analysis, there were only a minority of factors that, taken alone, may be responsible for recommendation disagreement: when comparing the HT-indicated PCI cohort with the GPT-indicated PCI (theoretical) cohort ( Table 3 ), the only barely significant differences were a slightly lower ejection fraction in the HT group (51 ± 10% vs. 56 ± 7%, p = 0.020) and a higher prevalence of hypertension (95.2% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.047).

We could not find an interaction for aaCCI and oncological treatment but did find an interaction between age (older or younger than 70 years) and oncological treatment, which, however, was barely significant ( p = 0.02 for resection of metastasis; p = 0.01 for systemic treatment alone).

Among clades, the overall LR test was barely significant ( p = .02, pseudo‐ R 2 = .02), with the largest difference occurring in the proportional representation of “typical Alnus ” sequences, which occurred in nearly 17% of non‐alder clones compared to 6% of clones derived from A. tenuifolia rhizosphere soil ( p = .007) (Table 1 ).

20/25) was barely significant (p=0.023; Fisher’s exact test).

The females of (PM2 + NPK1) + Δ and (PM2 + NPK2) + Δ showed average weights greater than the females collected in PM2 + Δ ( P < 0.001) while having barely significant more proteins ( P = 0.027) for (PM2 + NPK1) + Δ and non-significant ones ( P = 0.16) for (PM2 + NPK2) + Δ.