Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
In the multivariate analysis, including all parameters with a p -value < 0.30 from the binary logistic regression, arterial hypertension showed a borderline significance (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.06–0.99); p = 0.05), while coronary artery disease was identified as a significant predictor for non-sustained VT (OR 4.99 (95% CI 1.11–22.46); p = 0.04).
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Tornetta reduction quality did not differ significantly across the four groups overall ( p = 0.139); however, the proportion of acceptable reductions was lower in Group 4 (74.1%) compared with Group 3 (96.3%), with a borderline significant difference (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.050; Table 5 ).
borderline significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
In CMML, ASXL1 and TET2 mutations were associated with a trend toward better prognosis compared with wild-type (HR 0.21, p = 0.052; HR 0.25, p = 0.057, respectively), while U2AF1 mutations were associated with adverse prognosis in univariate analysis with borderline significance (HR 12.20, p = 0.050).
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Noteworthy, the highest logistic regression coefficients obtained in the CL group were for the questions on “reading”, “driving at night”, “working with PC” and “watching tv” ( Figure 1 B), all four questions being related to functionality (OSDI B) and being nearly significant for the classification as symptomatic, subject only to the score given to “reading” ( p = 0.05, t -test of conformity).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Under conservative Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0033), the NLR–dyspnea ( p = 0.001) and MUST–appetite loss ( p = 0.001) associations remained statistically significant; the NLR–physical functioning, NLR–role functioning, and MUST–nausea/vomiting associations were nominally significant ( p < 0.05) but did not survive Bonferroni correction and are reported as exploratory.
marginally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
38), pre-SLS test-dominant (26.8% decrease in falls for 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-dominant, p = 0.003), pre-SLS test-non-dominant (15.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-non-dominant, p = 0.029), MMSE (10.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in MMSE, p = 0.018), and marginally significant for pre-FRT (4.6% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-FRT, p = 0.050).
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Influences on vTUG Total Time Among the tested variables, the UPDRS III gait subscore, patient-reported motion status, shoe type, and chair used significantly improved the AIC, reducing it from 998.19 in the base model to 938.57 in the full model, and were highly significant in the likelihood ratio test (LRT) ( p < 0.05).
The Cox regression with Firth’s penalized maximum likelihood analysis revealed that only MACE (χ 2 = 23.6; HR 9.49 (3.63–30.72); p < 0.001) was independently associated with increased risk of CVD death, whereas the effect of age did not reach statistical significance (χ 2 = 3.8; HR 1.02 (1.00–1.09); p = 0.05) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.