While the family structure was not associated with anger dysregulation, there was a marginally significant relationship between family structure and deviance propensity ( p = 0.055) (i.e., a direct effect).
Excerpts
Self-reported duration of SHS exposure decreased by 100% in Spanish venues where smoking was totally banned (p < 0.01), whereas a borderline significant decrease (from 8 hours median exposure per day to 1 hour per day; p = 0.055) was observed in venues where smoking was partially permitted.
Subsequent inclusion of Gender as a factor revealed no main effect of Gender on subjective stress; however, a near-significant Setting × Gender interaction was reported (F 3,37.7 = 2.764, p = 0.055).
borderline significancep = 0.055
Education was not found to be significant in any study samples, whereas in women education was positively associated with perceived stress with borderline significance (b = 0.024, p = 0.055).
Obesity had a borderline significant association with poor SRH in model 2 only (OR = 1.33; p = 0.055).
a trend towards significancep = 0.055
A trend towards significance was found in the central end zone (F 2,35 = 3.164, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.153).
It should be noted that the correlation calculated was close to being significant ( r s = 0.208 , p = 0.055 ).
In terms of the COPM_P, the improvement was marginally significant ( p = 0.055), with a medium effect size ( r = 0.48).
approached significancep = 0.055
There was one exception: the two-way interaction of SVI by time was affected by the inclusion of mPNES in the model, suggesting that higher SVI scores may be associated with faster declines in visuospatial ability for those who did not relocate from their baseline address (estimate = −0.014, SE = 0.006, p = 0.019), and the three-way interaction of mPNES, SVI, and time approached significance (estimate = −0.012, SE = 0.006, p = 0.055).
Regarding the relationships between the variables, the regression analysis controlling for age, sex and time since diagnosis showed a significant negative association for STAI A/S with 2MWT (β = −0.27, p = 0.042) and an almost significant association with Berg (β = −0.25, p = 0.055) ( Figure 2 ).
33.87 mL/kg/min, p = 0.010) with a marginally significant overall-between effect ( p = 0.055).
close to significancep = 0.055
The corresponding linear ordinal multinomial regression reported close results with CA-BDI as a significant predictor (Wald = 4.24, p = 0.04) and a Wald value close to significance for TEPS-CONS (Wald = 3.67, p = 0.055).
The observed decrease between T2 and T3 was nearly significant, with p = 0.055.
Conversely, children with two or more older siblings (aRRR 2.31; 95% CI 0.98–5.43) were at greater risk of following trajectory 3 compared to children with no older siblings, although this association just failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
The main effect of PA on the experienced fatigue was close to being significant (F (1,48) = 3.867, p = 0.055); furthermore, the Partial Eta-Squared, ηp 2 , was 0.075 for the main effect, indicating a medium effect size.
bordered on significancep = 0.055
Although chest pain and MS relapse were not significantly associated with reported effects in the multivariate model, chest pain bordered on significance ( p = 0.055).
Ant” task this result did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
However, after adjusting for depressive symptoms at time 1, the effect of anxiety at time 1 on depressive symptoms later at time 2 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).
More women than men who practiced SDU (37.7% and 21.7%, respectively) “always” used a condom in their penetrative sex, although the differences were marginally significant (χ 2 = 10.800, p = 0.055).
On the other hand, the percentage of CD16+/CD56 T cells showed a significant decrease in all groups except group 5 ( p = 0.136), while group 3 was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).
Despite having higher depressive symptoms that were marginally significant ( p = 0.055) and slightly lower SRH, it is also unclear why there was no significant association between depressive symptoms and SRH in the IL sample.
The weak association between previous and in-season injury approaching significance ( p = 0.055), which is consistent with what has been established previously in the literature [ 9 , 10 , 18 , 19 ], may be due to the low proportion of in-season injuries in the current study.
Psychological Distress Main effects of group was significant on depressive symptoms ( F (1, 88) = 5.832, p = 0.018) and perceived stress ( F (1, 88) = 7.213, p = 0.009), whereas there were significant main effects of timepoint on anxiety symptoms ( F (2, 176) = 3.628, p = 0.032) and perceived stress ( F (2, 176) = 7.754, p = 0.001), as well as marginally significant on depressive symptoms ( F (2, 176) = 3.019, p = 0.055) ( Table 2 ).
At month one, the inter-group difference in the employment status reached marginal significance (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99–1.51, P = 0.056).
The difference in retention rates at month one was marginally significant ( P = 0.056), while those at month 6 ( P = 0.025) and month 12 ( P = 0.005) were statistically significant. 3.3.