Sex, height, potassium, and alanine aminotransferase had a trend nearing significance ( p < 0.1).
Excerpts
], excluding the interval 800–880 msec: at the highest threshold of 4.2 SD when Δt is equal or larger to 2.95 msec, and the interval 300–380 msec: at thresholds larger than 3.3 SD when Δt equal or larger than 2.95 msec, (the lower thresholds 3.3 and 3.6 SD or the smaller Δt 2.95 msec are related to marginally significant p-values (p < 0.1), higher thresholds while at larger Δt are non-significant), LLR stretched_Lognormal (min, max) = [2, 5 * 10 2 ], p(min, max) = [10 −324 , 4 * 10 −2 ], LLR truncPL_stretched (min, max) = [2, 10 3 ], (p(min, max) = [10 −324 , 5 * 10 −2 ], excluding the interval −80–0 msec with marginal significance p < 0.1 at highest threshold when Δt is the largest, and the interval 800–880 msec at highest threshold, 4.2 SD, while Δt larger than 0.98 msec ( i . e ., marginally significant at Δt 1.97 msec, and non-significance at larger Δt).
of marginal significancep < 0.1
of an exponentially truncated power law compared to lognormal and stretched exponential distributions for both evoked and rest: LLR truncPL_Lognormal > 4 * 10 1 , p < 10 −3 , LLR stretched_Lognormal > 10 1 , p < 10 −21 , LLR truncPL_stretched > 10 1 , (p < 10 −3 , with the exception of two segments of marginal significance p < 0.1, and two non-significant segments.
borderline significancep < 0.1
Two of the genes displayed a significant association with patient survival (p < 0.05), and one showed borderline significance (p < 0.1).
The mean air temperatures during the maturation periods of ‘Fuji’, exhibited a significantly increasing trend ( P < 0.05), and that for ‘Tsugaru’ showed an increasing trend ( P < 0.1, Supplementary Table S2 ).
approached significanceP = 0.100
For HFD versus LFD rats, GU of insulin-stimulated single fibers was significantly (P < 0.05) lower for IIA, IIAX, IIBX, IIB, and approached significance for IIX (P = 0.100), but not type I (P = 0.776) fibers.
There was also a statistical trend (p < 0.1) between MPR values for patients with poor outcome and the deceased (Fig. 2 a–c).
borderline significanceP < 0.1
There was a trend of higher alpha diversities (number of species, Chao1 and Shannon index) for CRA + compared to CRA- with a borderline significance (0.05 < P < 0.1).
close to significancep < 0.10
In addition, when we consider the biomarkers with responses close to significance (0.05 < p < 0.10), the response to pollutants of one more biomarker presented differences between the high and low pollution groups during periods with good access to sea ice, whereas during the period with low access to sea ice, this was observed in four more biomarkers (Table 2 ).
The results revealed a marginally significant effect of smiling on trustworthiness (Model 1; p <.10), with trustworthiness significantly predicting funding likelihood (Model 2; p <.01).
Third, we created multivariable models adjusted for factors with statistical significance ( p < 0.050) or marginal significance (0.050 ≤ p < 0.100) in comparison analyses, in addition to sex, age, and body mass index.
For significant or marginally significant ( p <.1) effects and interactions involving valence or face status, follow-up planned comparisons were performed using multiplicity-adjusted treatment-versus-control contrasts in the emmeans package 112 .
a trend towards significancep < 0.10
Factors with a trend towards significance (p < 0.10) were included in a multivariable regression analysis.
showed a trendp = 0.10
AD patients showed a trend towards reduced TSH (1.38 ± 0.84 vs 1.58 ± 0.73, p = 0.10) and fT4 (1.17 ± 0.17 vs 1.22 ± 0.21, p = 0.08) levels, although not reaching the statistical significance; in contrast fT3 was significantly lower (3.04 ± 0.33 vs 3.18 ± 0.27, p = 0.004).
We also detected a marginally significant (p < 0.1) increase in the proportion of all mutations that occurred at CpG dinucleotides in the BaP group.
In each model, we observed a significant main effect for time (model 7: t (1260) = 8.693, β = 0.143, p < 0.001) as well as a marginally significant main effect for the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (model 7: t (1260) = 1.837, β = 0.078, p < 0.1).
Differences between racial groups overall were marginally statistically significant (ANOVA p values = 0.1 for group comparisons).
The result of a statistical test was considered as a statistical trend for p < 0.1 and significant for p < 0.05 and SAS, release 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistics.
showed a trendp < 0.1
However, EDV showed a trend of positive correlations with age at both 0 m and 6 m, and LVIDd and SV at 6 m only ( p < 0.1).
EEG-fNIRS fusion findings Using ssmCCA analyses, we found a set of brain regions in the left hemisphere that showed borderline significant ( p < 0.10) correlations between the HbO changes and α desynchronization during the ME, MO, and MI conditions.
However, a correlation (R 2 = 0.34) was observed between weight gain and energy expenditure that was not quite significant (P = 0.100) (Fig. 3g ).
To comprehensively explore the biological themes suggested by the methylation changes, we performed unbiased KEGG and GO enrichment analyses using nominally significant (raw P < 0.1) DMS/DMR sets.
Variables that were marginally significant at a level of P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were selected in the multivariate model.
showed a trendp = 0.1
This increase showed a trend compared to C6-Wistar ( p = 0.1) and was statistically significant compared to F98-SD ( p < 0.05).
The insula activity in the nonsuicidal depressed patients was at an intermediate level between the suicide attempters and healthy controls, with a marginal significance level when directly compared to each group (p < 0.1, post hoc Tukey’s test).