Thus, the correlation is significant and marginally significant (i.e. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) at these two site.
Excerpts
Risk factors were first explored using a univariate analysis; those which showed at least a marginally significant association ( P < 0.1) were then considered as candidates for a subsequent forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression.
showed a trendp = 0.10
Employment status also did not have a significant association, although not being employed, showed a trend towards increased positive attitudes (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.91–2.87, p = 0.10).
showed a trendp = 0.1
This increase showed a trend compared to C6-Wistar ( p = 0.1) and was statistically significant compared to F98-SD ( p < 0.05).
showed a trendP ≤ 0.1
control groups to the EPM results reveal that a decreased in relative abundance of Bacteroides uniformis and Coprococcus eutactus in AgNC-treated individuals showed a trend for a negative correlation with time spent in the center of the maze (P ≤ 0.1, Fig. 13 ).
7b , at least 50% of the pairs of functional subcategories in each major categories showed significant (p < 0.05) or marginally significant (p < 0.1) correlations, with coefficients above 0.25.
borderline significancep < 0.1
Two of the genes displayed a significant association with patient survival (p < 0.05), and one showed borderline significance (p < 0.1).
Among all 16 drugs with transporter information in DrugBank, the annotated transporters for six of them were significantly enriched (p < 0.05) in the predictive features, and three additional drugs had borderline significant enrichment (p < 0.1, Fig. 5 ).
did not quite reach significancep = 0.10
As with unilateral AION, the rod-weighted logI 50 for both affected eyes was higher compared to control eyes but the difference did not quite reach significance (median logI 50 for better eyes = −2.40 log cd/m2, for worse eyes = −2.31 log cd/m2 compared to −2.60 log cd/m2 for control eyes, p = 0.10).
The linear term remained significant if we removed group BWE, KUY, or UGE; it became a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.10) if we removed group INS, ISA, NTA, TIT, or URU; and the p-value increased to 0.57 if we removed the largest group.
a trend towards significanceP > 0.10
However, when responses over each time period were compared between women and men, aside from a trend towards significance for stroke volume (Fig. 2 , panel D) and index of contractility (Fig. 4 , panel D), no significant gender differences (all P > 0.10) were identified in response to water ingestion.
The results showed a statistical trend ( p < 0.10) for the number of upper limb movements: right ( p = 0.092) and left ( p = 0.088), suggesting a possible link between higher hand motor activity at 3 months of age and more significant gains in HINE scores.
close to significancep < 0.1
The difference was close to significance (p < 0.1).
borderline significanceP < 0.10
The multivariate analysis was adjusted to include clinically significant variables (age ≥ 65, gender, Shock index > 1, active bleeding, and endoscopic ligation) and variables with at least borderline significance ( P < 0.10) in univariate analysis.
approached significancep = 0.10
Demographical and clinical characteristics that approached significance with p = 0.10 as a cutoff were included in multivariable analyses.
showed a trendp = 0.1
4 B), while A53T mice overexpressing UBQLN2 (A53TxUb2-hi) showed a trend toward decreased levels of α-syn compared to A53T (n = 7; p = 0.1).
a trend towards significancep ≤ 0.10
Results with a trend towards significance are reported up to p ≤ 0.10.
Bacterial associations at baseline A total of 18 paired species associations were marked as being found in co-occurrence at a rate different from expected by random chance (Spearman ranked correlations, p < 0.05) whereas an additional 12 species were approaching significance (Spearman ranked correlations, p < 0.1; Fig. 4 and Table 1 ).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of mortality and poor outcomes during hospitalization, adjusting for clinical variables identified by univariate analysis as showing significant or marginally significant (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) differences between the presence or absence of each outcome.
showed a trendP < 0.1
However, hair zinc showed a trend (P < 0.1, corrected) toward negative correlation with SQ score, the sleep disturbance subscore of the WHOGHQ30, and reverse Stroop interference.
However, for 41% of pixels, the direction of the temporal trend in interannual variation in greenup onset was opposite to that in spring temperature; 6% of these pixels exhibited a significant trend (P < 0.1, Fig. 4 c).
Although, no T3 of any dietary pattern significantly was associated with a higher OR for serum phosphorus level > 1.78 mmol/l ( p > 0.05), still a non-significant trend ( p = 0.067) was observed with the SSB DP (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.97, 2.79), which could be considered significant for p value < 0.10.
Moreover, while PM data is not significant, the distribution of DMs is slightly significant according to the χ 2 test ( p < 0.1).
In our independent validation cohort (12 JMML patients and 6 PN), significant and near-significant (P ≤ 0.1) overexpression was confirmed for 10 and 4 lncRNAs respectively (31%) (Supplemental Figure S1 ).
The numbers of biochemicals that achieved statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.05) between infected compared to uninfected treatment groups was 75 (34 higher and 41 lower) in the tissue (Supplemental Table S11 ) and 111 (52 higher and 59 lower) in the contents (Supplemental Table S12 ), as well as those approaching significance (0.05 < p < 0.10) with 31 in tissue (15 higher and 16 lower) and 35 in the contents (24 higher and 11 lower).