“could be considered significant”

Thus, a correlation above r = 0.14 could be considered significant ( P = 0).

Of those, 149,773 could be considered significant at P < 2e−10.

Indeed, 299 sites could be considered significant ( P < 1.33 × 10 −4 , Bonferroni correction).

There was no significant correlation between the age and the measured urinary parameters among silica-exposed workers. Work duration in addition to the urinary Si level could be considered significant (p<0.001) predictors for the elevated urinary parameters among silica-exposed workers.

To tell a methodology story, we tentatively set the threshold as p = 0.001, and the metabolite marker could be considered significant if - log 10 ( p ) ≥ 3.0 .

By simulating all possible combinations of scores across the 5 (penetrations) × 16 (electrode contacts) recording grid and assuming the null hypothesis that any differences arise by chance, we found that a score of ≥2, or ≤−2, could be considered significant at p < 0.005.

At the same time, it was established that only 20 out of 42 proteins could be considered significant (with P < .01) for distinguishing groups with antenatal pathologies (CRDM, CNSD, and HPMG) from groups of T2DM patients who gave birth to healthy newborns and the control group.

Using a single-voxel threshold of p = 0.005, a cluster connection radius of 5.1 mm, and Gaussian smoothing at 6 mm, it was calculated that activation clusters exceeding 17 contiguous voxels (in original space) could be considered significant at a corrected cluster-wise threshold of p < 0.01.

An ALP reduction to the normal range after chemotherapy could be considered significant (LR univariate analysis P = 0.0480).

The result showed that SCC and KA could be considered significant risk factors for nonoperative treatment failure in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fracture ( p < 0.05).

The critical value represents the t value at which a difference could be considered significant given the smallest sample of adults ( n = 20 for studies 1 and 3; t(18) = 2.08, p = 0.05).

However, when evaluating PPP and PMH ( Table 10 ), only differences in PPP could be considered significant and with p < 0.1.

Although, no T3 of any dietary pattern significantly was associated with a higher OR for serum phosphorus level > 1.78 mmol/l ( p > 0.05), still a non-significant trend ( p = 0.067) was observed with the SSB DP (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.97, 2.79), which could be considered significant for p value < 0.10.

The threshold above which the degree of correlation between genes in L 0 and L path could be considered significant and a gene in L 0 classified as pathway/network associated gene was determined based on a resampling-based method as follows.

When dapagliflozin ointment and transdermal patch were used in both the ointment (group 3) and patch (group 5) groups, it was not possible to confirm the presence of dapagliflozin in serum at levels that could be considered significant.

Furthermore, to confirm that the small scaling factors we obtained were indeed indicative of multiplicative scaling, we asked the question of how small a scaling factor could be considered significant.

Studies of that type raise the possibility that the processes of energy generation and oxidative damage could be considered significant targets for the treatment of mood disorders.

‘Supercascade Red’ could be considered significant due to a few considerable outliers, the potential correction in future research would render the results significant.

DEmiRNA analysis between Cancer versus Healthy was not performed because, in this setting, the markers that show changes only in Healthy and not in Cancer could be considered significant.

Conclusions Lyme disease imposes an economic burden that could be considered significant in the US and other developed countries to justify further research efforts in disease control and management.

The fit and the DIC of the constrained (DICc) GLMM suggested that this adjusted- R score could be considered significant in both cases, evidencing the existence of aggressive and non-aggressive behavioural types ( Tables 1 and 2 ).

Impact of perturbation on wildlife Although some species had large positive or negative relationships with the covariates, only a few relationships could be considered significant (95% C.I. does not overlap zero; Fig. 6 ).

The statistical significance of the results was evaluated using the Wilcoxon test (confidence level ≥ 95%) to investigate whether the differences between the resulting experimental values could be considered significant. 3.

Because values of synchrony are not completely independent, 95% confidence intervals for each path were estimated by bootstrapping ( n = 10,000) [4] where a proportional overlap of less of 0.5 could be considered significant [39] .

Statistical analysis We applied chi-squared test at a p < 0.01 to investigate whether the differences observed between groups could be considered significant.