Excerpts

Regarding hematological toxicities, a slight trend was also observed in the occurrence of agranulocytosis ( p = 0.071).

When analyses were repeated using Spearman rho correlation, four associations remained significant (see Table 2 ), including the associations between Proximity and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Contact and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Proximity and OXTR binding in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004), and Contact and OXTR binding density in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004); the associations between OXTR binding in PSB1 and Proximity and Contact were marginally significant ( p = 0.071; see Table 2 ).

The main effect of neither facial expression or of the context approached significance level, nor did the interaction (for mean proportions of correct responses: max F = 3.670; min p = .071, max η p 2 = .057; for RTs max F = 1.296; min p = .269, max η p 2 = .014; see Figure 2a ).

For the arousal ratings, a three-way ANOVA revealed the significant main effect of stimulus type, indicating higher arousal ratings for normal than for anti- expressions, F (1,36) = 57.41, p = 0.000, η 2 p = 0.615, and marginally significant main effect of group, F (1,36) = 3.47, p = 0.071, η 2 p = 0.088.

The main effect of the display condition was marginally significant ( H (2) = 5.294, p = 0.071).

In addition, regressing hippocampal volume on perceived threat while simultaneously controlling for correlated self-report measures of anxiety, depression, and worry scores showed a trend-level relationship for perceived threat ( t (33) = −1.87, b = −32.4, p = 0.071) and no relationships for any of the other self-report indices (all | t s| < 0.8, all | b s| < 17, all p s > 0.4).

A comparison of this effect between the two groups was approaching significance U = 14.5 , p = 0.071.

The same pattern was evident for Sleep/Rest Fatigue scores, with a main effect of FSS change group ( F [2, 192] = 5.42, p = 0.005) and significantly lower scores in the “improved” group than the “unchanged” group ( Mean DIFF = 1.93 [0.31, 3.55], p = 0.014), although the difference between “improved” and “deteriorated” groups only approached significance (Sleep/Rest Fatigue: Mean DIFF = 1.65 [−0.10, 3.39], p = 0.071).

The continuous value of PM thickness was negatively associated with HCC recurrence risk with a marginal significance (coefficient = −0.089 [9% increase in recurrence risk per unit decrease in PM thickness], hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 [0.83–1.01], p = 0.071).

Similarly, postprandial PYY secretion also showed a trend for diminished afternoon levels only in IFG/IGT subjects ( Fig. 4A ) (p = 0.071 for difference of Δ between NGT and IFG/IGT).

For RMSE, the main effect of Test ( F 1, 23 = 5.358, p = 0.03, partial - η 2 = 0.189) was significant and the main effect of Segment approached significance ( F 1, 23 = 3.578, p = 0.071, partial - η 2 = 0.135).

1A ), it only had borderline significance as a predictive factor for idiopathic IP (8% vs. 3%, P = 0.071, Table 4 and Fig. 1B ).

The three groups of paternal ages < 30, 30-<35 and ≥ 35 years showed borderline significant differences in the OR of implantation failure between the two groups, smoking and never-smoking, in the paternal age group ≥ 35 years (ROR 1.75, p = 0.071), following a non-significant increased ROR at the paternal age of 30-<35 years (1.17, p = 0.277).

Cox regression analysis Patients with AF1q positive RC showed a trend towards a higher risk for disease recurrence ( p = 0.071), but no impact on disease-specific death.

A meta-analysis of 191 participants from 11 subgroups based on viscosity revealed a borderline significant decrease in hunger with higher viscosity food of − 2.10 mm (95%CI − 4.38 to 0.18, p = 0.071, I 2 = 59%) (see Fig. 3 b).

The effect estimates were slightly attenuated but maintained statistical significance for all pollutants except SO2, which showed borderline significance ( p = 0.071).

In contrast, other beliefs, such as the belief that waste is harmful, have a borderline significant association ( P = 0.071) with a coefficient of 0.078 and a confidence interval from − 0.0087 to 0.164, showing a weak relationship.

This showed a trend (p = 0.071) towards a better model when pulverised hair was used, see Table 3 .

negative (0.06 ± 0.05) emotion expressions of ingroup politicians, although the comparison was only marginally significant, ( p = 0.071).

The distribution of these four significantly explanatory variables along the ordination axes was further examined by GLM, which revealed a significant correlation ( P < 0.05) of all variables along axis 1 and axis 2, except a marginal significance in bio3 along axis 1 ( P = 0.0717, Table 4 ).

Furthermore, LINGO3 expression shows borderline significance (p = 0.0718), with an HR greater than 1 (HR = 1.94 [0.94-3.98]).

High CTLA4 expression showed HR of 4.19 but the P value only showed a trend towards significance (P = 0.072) possibly due to a small number of patients in the CTLA4-negative arm (Supplemental Fig. 10A ).

The live birth rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the STP group, differences between the two groups were close to significance (P = 0.072).

RER did not differ significantly between the tests in either the patient group (Z = 0.214, P = 0.830) or the control group, but in the control group, the difference was nearly significant (Z = 1.800, P = 0.072).

Level of education approached significance (B = −0.28, SE = 0.16, t = −1.82, p =.072); the negative coefficient suggests that nurses with higher education levels might have slightly lower knowledge scores, with a confidence interval of −0.59 to 0.03.