Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

fell short of significancep = 0.0701.4× alphagold
SPR for Brother John were also significantly correlated with all other rates (from SMT online pre-lab: r (45) = 0.37, p = 0.014) to clapping: r (53) = 0.57, p < 0.001), except walking ( r (49) = 0.26, p = 0.076), and those for Twinkle only fell short of significance with walking rate ( r (50) = 0.26, p = 0.070).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
2 A) with no significant main effect of session [F(4, 120) = 0.22, P = 0.93, η 2 = 0.0002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0, 0.0003)] and a significant interaction between session and contingency [F(4, 120) = 3.35, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0008, 0.01)], whereas the interaction between session and face perception was marginally significant [F(4, 120) = 2.20, P = 0.07, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0003, 0.003)].
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Higher WMH volume was associated with lower attention (β = − 0.03, SD = 0.01, p = 0.03) and approached significance with lower executive functions and language functioning (β = − 0.02, SD = 0.01, p = 0.07; β = − 0.02, SD = 0.01, p = 0.07, respectively, for the full models, Fig. 2 , and supplementary Table 1 ).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Does this indicate that a protein-like, low molecular weight DOC can also be highly photo-degradable if it has not yet been exposed to sunlight? The marginally significant positive correlation (p = 0.07) between the BR-DOC and PD-E w might suggest that the pools of DOC that support bio- and photo-degradation could be the same ( Fig. 2g ), as further supported by the positive correlation between a254/a365 and PD-E w (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2f ).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
The difference between the two groups’ slopes in the neutral-face condition was marginally significant (B = 29.889, SE = 16.241, t = 1.840, p = 0.07), with the depressed group’s slope being 29.89 pixels (or 4.5% of the available distance scale) flatter than the non-depressed group per unit of valence (solid lines across panels in Fig. 2 ).
a negative trendp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Although statistically not significant, there was a negative trend of correlation between fecal serotonin level and Shannon diversity index of Bacteroidetes ( p = 0.07, ρ = −0.21) and Chao1 richness index of Firmicutes ( p = 0.09, ρ = −0.19), but a positive correlation with Proteobacteria richness ( p = 0.06, ρ = 0.22) (Supplementary Fig. 5 ).