However, the increase in TEER from cells with TNFα removal was not sufficient enough for a significant difference to the cells without the removal of the cytokine, but was close to being statistically significant (one-way ANOVA: F (2,26) = 6.64, p = 0.0047, n = 7–13; TNFα w/o Recovery: 77.36 ± 11.41%; TNFα w/ Recovery: 115.88 ± 15.65%; p = 0.076).
← all phrases
“close to being statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.055
In the literature
The association of cortisol to cortisone ratio with pNN50 values was close to being statistically significant (r rm =-0.212, p=0.029).
The difference between the two groups was close to being statistically significant, with an unadjusted between-group difference of −0.36 (95% CI, −0.71 to −0.01; P = 0.041) and an adjusted between-group difference of −0.34 (95% CI, −0.69 to 0.01; P = 0.053) ( Supplementary Table S7 ).
Moreover, the cubic term of initial discrepancy in Model 2 has a positive effect that is close to being statistically significant at the p = 0.05 level.
WKYR: SHR exhibited a significatively larger s-OPA1/l-OPA1 ratio, in trained individuals and close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.05) in untrained individuals ( Figure 3C ).
For both the facility-based and home-based samples, there were no statistically-significant differences between control and NIVR groups for age, gender, or body mass index, although the difference between groups for BMI was close to being statistically significant (p=0.05) for the home-based sample, with the NIVR group having a larger BMI.
Our results can be considered as close to being statistically significant ( P value = 0.05).
The group difference between intervention completers and the WL at T2, however, was only close to being statistically significant ( P =.05, d =−0.42, 95% CI −0.79 to −0.06).
Cluster volume was a statistically significant predictor of eventual dementia onset in this model, and the hazard ratio for cluster growth was close to being statistically significant (volume: HR = 1.52, p = 0.05 and CI = [1.00,2.33]; growth: HR = 1.72, p = 0.06 and CI = [0.98, 3.00]).
The coma-like aberrations and total HOAs in the 5OZ group were also higher than those in the 6OZ group; the differences were close to being statistically significant (5OZ: Z = −1.957, P = 0.050; 6OZ: Z = −1.921, P = 0.055).
We also investigated if the Hp-Hb peak correlated with age and indeed observed that only age was close to being statistically significant (p = 0.05) in a linear regression model that included the participant groups and the square root of the Fe-peak areas corresponding to the Hp-Hb complex.
The difference in tumor volume was very close to being statistically significant (ANOVA, p > 0.05).
20 Though our study did not find a statistically significant increase in the Knowledge and Screening content domain between the pre- and post-test, the result was very close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.0506), which indicates the result was trending toward significance.
Considering that the interaction between economic disadvantage and social inequality is rooted in comparison that occurs in the context of social relationships, we suggest that the interactive mechanism may be particularly salient for popular activities among boys (i.e., sports) while the mechanism works in general among girls (i.e., for all activities – although sports was technically an exception to this in the current study, it should be considered that interaction of sports and Gini coefficient was very close to being statistically significant, p = 0.051).
Gender and age We found that females reported more “moderate/more” anxiety than the male gender ( Table 3 ); however, the comparison of the median was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.051).
However, differences between levels were close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.051).
Aside from linearity, a significant step change was noted for leuprorelin ( P = .029) showing an increase in prescription items with a similar effect that is close to being statistically significant for goserelin ( P = .051).
Kaplan–Meier analysis after PSM showed that low PNI still remained as the risk factor for predicting poor OS (5-year OS: 81.5% versus 88.5%, P = 0.010) and DMFS (5-year DMFS: 80.7% versus 90.1%, P = 0.002) but not for poor PFS, which just was very close to being statistically significant (5-year PFS: 71.9% versus 78.6%, P = 0.051).
This effect was close to being statistically significant ( P = 0·051).
Although close to being statistically significant, the phylogenetic signals in seed predator richness (K = 0.004, P = 0.051) and seed predation rate (K = 0.006, P = 0.082) were negligible.
The mild/moderate cases with low calcium also showed significantly lower NT-proBNP, eGFR and SpO2 than the mild/moderate cases with normal calcium; while in the severe/critical cases with low calcium showed the significantly low level of hs-cTnI and PT, the eGFR level was close to being statistically significant ( P =0.055), and AST was just about significant ( P =0.051).
However, the result for the overall frequency of AEs between the groups was extremely close to being statistically significant ( P = 0.051) and showed an increasing frequency according to CKD severity (20.4–44.4%).
For the CKD or not, there was a significant difference among the 3 groups categorized according to stool types ( P < .001), while the difference between the groups classified according to bowel movements was close to being statistically significant ( P = .051).
At two weeks, there were no differences in ER/CR ratios, though wounds treated with A was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.051, 62% increase).
The LA volume index was close to being statistically significant (HR [95%CI] = 1.011 [1.00; 1.02]; p = 0.052).