Excerpts

Greenfinches ( Carduelis chloris ) and tree sparrows also showed higher population densities in 2010 but differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10; Fig. 4 ).

Variables that reached borderline significance (p<0.1) in the univariate analysis were considered for inclusion into the multivariate models.

An ANOVA on this data showed a trend of an effect of day [F(3,79) = 2.01, p = 0.1)] and there may be some contribution of outlying points in determining this trend.

Data analysis was completed based on statistical significance (as well as those approaching significance (0.05<p<0.10).

Statistical significance levels were set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance p < 0.1 [ 40 ].

However, given that most other measures showed no such interaction and this effect only reached marginal significance (p < .1), we are inclined to treat this finding as statistically unreliable, though future research may help clarify whether a genuine interaction exists.

However, the odds ratios approached significance for quartiles 1 and 3 (p<0.10).

The covariates, which were found to be significant or nearly significant (p≤0.10) in univariate analysis, were included to construct a multivariate model for assessing determinants of treatment failure by forward stepwise logistic regression.

The moderation analysis of time to peak HR, demonstrated a significant interaction effect of HR dynamics and frailty status on walking velocity ( p <0.01), and the interaction effect was marginally non-significant for other gait parameters ( p >0.10).

The expected threefold interaction of Group × Mood Induction × Time just failed to reach significance ( F [6,114] = 1.84, p = .10, η2 part = .09).

P-values in bold with asterisks highlighting differences that were significant (p≤0.05) and marginally significant (p<0.10).

None of the groups showed a statistically significant association with the presence of fruits and only a marginally significant ( P < 0.10) interaction between distance to the nearest water and presence of fruits was found for medium frugivores ( Fig 3 , Table 2 ).

Simple effects analyses indicated that Emoji Condition was significant for opinions, F (2, 658.38) = 8.27, and request refusals, F (2, 653.96) = 8.95 and marginally significant for disclosures, F (2, 731.30) = 2.32, p < .10.

There was also a marginally significant ( p <.10) interaction between race and sex in the transition from C 1 to A .

Significant and near-significant (p<0.10) differences were then assessed further for independence in sequentially adjusted linear regression models: adjusting first for demographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity); next for retinopathy, neuropathy and BMI; next for blood pressure and antihypertensive medication; and finally for HbA1c.

In the univariate analysis, there was a clear trend towards an increased risk of infection in the 6 months following rituximab (odds ratio: 1.51, 95% CI [0.90–2.56], p = 0.1).

While both viruses significantly upregulated TNFAIP3 transcription as predicted by the model ( Fig 6 ), there was slightly significant statistical evidence that the magnitude of this upregulation was lower in cells infected by 22–25 (p<0.1) 4 Discussion We constructed a mechanistic regulatory circuit model of the intracellular signaling pathways governing Type I IFN response to VSV infection based on causal relationships between the RIG-I and NFκB pathways documented in published scientific literature and experimental observations.

Our borderline significant results (0.05<p-value<0.10) in all likelihood are due to low statistical power.

It should be noted however that a positive trend was already noticeable at short term ( p < 0.1).

For sound words, the feature-priming condition also significantly differed from the corresponding first non-priming condition (p<.03; confirming criterion 1) and showed a trend for a difference to the second non-priming condition (p<.1) over the left hemisphere.

Any significant or marginally significant ( P <0.1) factors or interactions between factors were retained, and included in a new minimum adequate model.

And the group differences of C net and E local at some K cost points were significant ( P <0.05, uncorrected) or marginally significant ( P <0.1, uncorrected).

With regards to disclosure, women who fully disclosed ring use and study participation to their partners had higher PS and lower PR scores, with marginally significant differences in mean scores (at p<0.1).

This revealed no significant differences in either males (all P ≥ 0.05) or females (all P > 0.6), though responses at 800–1000 μA approached significance in males (0.05 < P < 0.10).

While the average amount taken per game is 301.8 Cents in wave 1 (remember that the maximum amount that could be taken is 500 Cents per game), this amount significantly increases to 425.4 in wave 2, and significantly increases further to 496.4 in wave 3 (differences are labeled as significant if p < 0.050 and are labeled as weakly significant if 0.050 ≤ p < 0.100).