Potential correlates that remained marginally statistically significant (p<0.10) from the univariable analyses were entered in final models including all variables and covariates.
Excerpts
Heterozygosity excess was significant (p<0.05) for the Wilcoxon test in all cases, except for the Western Cantabrian subpopulation without migrants, for which it was only marginally significant (p<0.1).
In addition, there were no significant associations of SNP with BMI ( Table 2 ) or with the probability of being overweight or obese ( Table 3 ), though rs266729 in ADIPOQ and rs7975600 in ADIPOR2 had a borderline significant association with the probability of being overweight (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.79, p = 0.10 and OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.06, p = 0.10, respectively) and rs2232853 with the probability of being obese (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.99, 2.61, p = 0.05).
a trend towards significancep-value = 0.1
Multiple logistic regression (using automated backward variable selection) was performed including those clinical parameters that showed at least a trend towards significance in univariate analysis (cut-off p-value = 0.1) using SPSS 15.0.
approached significanceP < 0.1
In addition, two other pathways (MAPK signaling and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum) approached significance ( P < 0.1).
Statistical and bioinformatic analyses Results are presented as least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) with differences deemed significant at P ≤ 0.05 and tendency towards significance at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1.
Across all three studies, Benevolence, Security, and Conformity values were significantly less important for vegetarians than they were for non-vegetarians, although the difference for Conformity was marginally significant ( p < .10) in the US study.
Although these associations were attenuated in Models 2–4, the association for dipstick proteinuria 1+ was borderline significant (e.g., p = 0.1 in Model 4).
Neither testis weight at slaughter (18 months) nor INSL3 concentration appear to correlate with average sperm density ( Fig 4A–4C ), although the former does exhibit a trend towards significance (p<0.10; Fig 4A ).
borderline significancep<0.10
We included all significant SNPs identified from our individual SNP analysis and an additional seven SNPs reaching borderline significance at p<0.10 ( Table 3 ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.1
Using a similar model, there was a similar direction of effect with a trend towards significance in Cohort 3 (p = 0.1).
marginally non-significantP < 0.10
Marginally non-significant (P < 0.10) associations with LTL are detected for systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, and DHEAS levels.
Separate group analyses were run if group status was marginally significant in any model ( p > .10).
When these two groups were compared, the age effect on the adaptive shifts was only marginally significant, -41.8° vs. −22.5°, F (1,18) = 3.9, p <.1.
Chronic lung disease is only mildly significant ( P < .10).
showed a trendp = 0.1
In the ROI associated with this activity, only the main effect of agent showed a trend ( p = 0.1), corresponding to an increased response to human expressions of disgust compared to robot's expression of the same emotion (paired t -test p = 0.1).
Triglycerides, total cholesterol and HDL Cholesterol were close to the level of significance for D allele (p<0.10).
A second measure of demand generation—exposure to family planning messages in the media at the community level—did not have the expected relationship in the multivariate model, only reaching modest significance (p < .10) in Burkina Faso, Uganda, and Kenya with regard to short-acting contraceptive use and Ghana with regard to long-acting method use.
We find a weakly significant general effect of relative savings ( F (1, 66) = 2.20, p < .10) on donations.
Women age 35 and above had twice the odds of inconsistently reporting that they experienced a post-partum complication relative to women age 15–24, although the value is only marginally significant (OR: 2.03, p < .10).
Elevation interacted significantly with living status for beech only, and almost doubled the difference between living and dead trees, whereas for pine, the effects were only marginally significant (p<0.1), though high in magnitude.
showed a trendp = 0.1
Ex vivo regional and voxel based morphometry following learning The total brain volume only showed a trend (p = 0.1) towards being enlarged in reachers (450± 11 mm 3 ) relative to controls (441±12 mm 3 ).
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and significance was established at p<0.05, although p-values “approaching significance” (i.e., 0.050<p<0.100) were also discussed given the exploratory nature of the investigation.
The factor that showed a tendency towards significance (at p<0.1) was ‘source of water’.
Between the glocal identity type corner and local identity type corner (Point D) this difference was marginally significant ( p < .10).