“close to the level of significance”

Ten of the transcripts were found to be differentially expressed in the same direction as in the RNA seq experiments; for three of the transcripts ( APOBEC3A , PLSCR1, IL1RN) , the fold change differences were statistically significant or close to the level of significance (p = 0.0005, p = 0.0489, p = 0.0507, respectively, Mann–Whitney test).

However, it is noteworthy that circulating eNOS concentrations were close to the level of significance (set at p < 0.05) in both groups, with an increasing and decreasing trend after OPO and SO intake, respectively. 3.7.

This model also included the effect of BD on GSC, whose coefficient was close to the level of significance ( β = −0.28, p = 0.05).

The logistic regression model and a stepwise model selection demonstrated significant predictors for operation in age groups: In the 0–4 year group—AD after furosemide injection ( p = 0.04), in the 5–9 year group—parenchymal sclerosis ( p = 0.02) and the AD after furosemide was close to the level of significance ( p = 0.05) and in the 10–17 year group—parenchymal sclerosis ( p = 0.02).

In a minority of cases (4/80) that were previously close to the level of significance ( p < 0.05), the results of statistical tests changed from significant to not significant or vice versa.

The p ‐values attained for several nutrients (fiber, iron, thiamine, and riboflavin) investigating the association of education were close to the level of significance ( p = .05).

In terms of rotational errors, the t ‐test shows that the difference in the R x direction is close to the level of significance ( t = −1.95, p = 0.051), indicating that the error differences in the R x direction between the two groups are small but exhibit a certain trend.

Other than the difference in wasting prevalence, for which the P value was close to the level of significance ( P = 0.053), there were no significant differences between cohorts in the morbidity markers that we measured at year 1 ( Table 2 ).

Differences between the four groups were close to the level of significance (p = 0.054).

Patients with diabetes were less likely to have an excellent outcome compared to non-excellent in univariate analysis, but this association disappeared after adjustment for age and sex, with a P -value close to the level of significance ( P = 0.055) ( Tables 4 and 5 ).

The results showed the up-regulation of Buffy and BIRC5 in both the AH and CH groups for the (P<0.05; Table 2 ) and the down-regulation of IAPASSO and TNF3 in the AH group alone, that was close to the level of significance (P = 0.055 and P = 0.057, respectively).

Table 4 shows that the mean and mean rank of the first preceptors’ indicator (concisely covered all aspects of history taking) were 4.23 and 34.48, respectively, in the SNAPPS group, compared with 3.83 and 26.52, respectively, of the control group but the difference was close to the level of significance (p = 0.055).

Differences in the incidence of injuries depending on the duration of the training session were close to the level of significance ( p = 0.056).

For the performance in memory, the correlation with the global FEOBV SUVR was close to the level of significance ( r = 0.502, p = 0.057). 3.3 Voxel-Wise analysis of FEOBV PET across cognitive domains Significant FEOBV SUVR reductions (TFCE-corrected p < 0.05) among the participants with MCI comparing to the CU individuals were found in a small focal cluster (1.2 ml ) near the middle temporal gyrus in the right hemisphere ( t -value = 4.583 ± 0.597, Fig. 3 ).

In high-risk patients with STEMI TIMI, BTP levels obtained at the time of admission were found to be higher, close to the level of significance (p = 0.058) (Table 3 ).

The difference was close to the level of significance (p = 0.06).

PR3+ individuals did not differ from controls, and the difference between PR3+ and MPO+ subjects was only close to the level of significance ( p = 0.06).

Although not statistically significant, we could observe an up-regulation of this gene in M5 LN compared to HN with a p -value close to the level of significance ( p = 0.06).

Angioplasty of left carotid bulb and post-procedural hs-CRP levels was very close to the level of significance (P=0.06).

Close to the level of significance ( p = 0.0636) was the count of LAB in groups A, B, and E.

Conversely, no significant correlation between OI and the BDI score was observed, although the p value was very close to the level of significance ( p = 0.064) (Table 4 ).

RFD) was close to the level of significance ( F = 3.1, p = 0.064).

Also, results close to the level of significance (p=0.066) were found at Post 30Min when the control group had values further from zero than the experimental group (−8.01±9.46 vs −1.39±11.47 mm).

Volume I, were not significant; however, they showed values very close to the level of significance ( p = 0.067).

The AUC of PCO and CRP did not significantly differ from the line of no discrimination although the P value of PCO was close to the level of significance ( p = 0.068).