Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a trend towards significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Correlation between PMNs mobilization and CXCL1 plasma levels was also evaluated and we found a clear significance (r = 0.66, p = 0.001) when animals of all groups were included (n = 28) and a trend towards significance (r = 0.71, p = 0.08) when only ischemic animals were evaluated (n = 7) (Data not shown).
With no covariates included, the treatment impact on H&F accuracy was positive, but not statistically significant ( ß = 0.14, SE = 0.08), but this effect grew larger when covariates were added, as our fully-controlled regression model indicated a marginally statistically significant effect of 0.18 ( SE = 0.09, p = 0.08).
In all datasets combined, results were as follows ( Fig 14b ): Combined Stage 2 JTI = 1.81 + 0.38 * z − PC 1 (.06) (.06) Combined Stage 3 JTI = 1.59 + 0.22 * z − PC 1 (.05) (.05) Combined Stage 4 JTI = 1.24 + 0.07 * z − PC 1 (.03) (.04) Difference in Stage-2 and -3 slopes approached but did not reach significance (t = 1.75, p = .08) but Stage-3 and -4 slopes differed significantly (t = 2.25, p = .03).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Moreover, when assessments were spatially localized via 2D-CSI MRS ( Fig 4A ), border-zone measurements of both PCr/ATP ( Fig 4B ) and Flux PCr→ATP ( Fig 4D ) were significantly greater in Cell+Patch animals than in Patch animals, and differences between the two groups for border-zone measurements of k PCr→ATP ( Fig 4C ) approached significance ( p = 0.08).