Excerpts

The interaction between MTB race time and training modality was almost significant (p = 0.08), with a smaller ES in HIT vs.

A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with cue-type and number-of-items as factors indicated that the main effect of cue type was non-significant ( F (3,21) = 1.6, p = 0.22), the main effect of number-of-items was significant ( F (1,7) = 6.46, p <0.04), and the interaction between these factors falls just short of significance ( F (3,21) = 2.67, p <0.08).

We found borderline significant interaction between BMI z-scores and atopy on FVC ( P = 0.08) and FEV 1 ( P = 0.07).

In the PP and SILP, the CD8 T cell compartment showed a trend towards increased early-activated CD8 T cells after WT- treatment only ( WT vs. medium P = 0.08 and P = 0.06 resp.) ( Figure 3C ).

There was a borderline significant association for head tilt when writing (P = 0.08) ( Table 4 ).

A one-way ANOVA comparing the four taste groups was not statistically significant, but showed a trend towards possible differences across the taste groups (F(3,196) = 2.2, p = .08).

Those who used more products with antimicrobials had less prudent attitudes (-2.0%), although this was only marginally significant in the full model (p = 0.08, see Table 3 in S1 Text ).

Also, a significant difference in food intake was observed between the AG and UAG treated groups, while UAG noticeably reduced the appetitive response to AG when given in combination, although this effect only showed a trend ( Fig. 1 ; AG+UAG treatment, 4.1 g±0.56, p = 0.08).

Although the mean difference between causally related and unrelated words (1.97μV) was larger than the mean difference between causally related and hierarchically related words (1.49μV), only marginally significant difference was found between causally related and unrelated words ( p = .08).

DUT was significantly associated with smoking (p = 0.01), HELZ was of marginal significance with alcohol (p = 0.08), and although smokers had lower HELZ expression than never smokers as with RNAseq, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.34).

Exclusion of an extreme outlier (see Fig 6 ) suggests negative correlations between vBMD and age (R = -0.71), and between BW and PI (R = -0.65) as well as a positive correlation between BW and vBMD (R = 0.67) although these associations did not quite reach statistical significance (p<0.08), likely due to limited power of this feasibility study.

marina biomass remained significant (p = 0.039), and maximum fetch was marginally significant (p = 0.080).

MPS was significantly increased by CP compared with PLA (p<0.05), and approached significance compared with WP at 1 h post exercise (p = 0.08).

The small-world clustering ( Fig 3D , left) for the positive edges showed a significant difference between CNT and MCS and a fairly significant difference (p=0.08) between CNT and UWS, but failed to distinguish between MCS and UWS, and the same for the negative edges, where it could only differentiate between CNT and UWS.

Only haplotype *2 in the recipient (rs41507953 A / rs751141 A/ rs1042032 G) displayed a statistical trend towards higher risk of ARE [OR = 2.28 (0.92–5.67), p = 0.08].

Room was a marginally significant predictor of indoor fungal community composition (ADONIS, df = 3, F. model = 1.26, R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.08.

Although the results did not show any significant effect, Table 6 shows a two-way interaction between bystanders’ attitude towards the participants and virtual peer speakers approaching significance ( p = .08).

In a Cox Proportional Hazards model adjusting for gender and depression onset, RA PRS predicted autoimmune disorder hazard (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01–1.31, P = 0.03), with a nominally significant independent effect of depression status (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.97–1.38, P = 0.08).

The h 2 of 0.20 of bill width tended towards significance ( z = 2.33, P = 0.08) whereas the h 2 of 0.05 in bill depth was far from significant ( z = 0.60, P = 0.58).

While Ln OPN was only approaching significance in the full model [HR (95% CI) = 1.20 (0.98, 1.48); P = 0.08)], it was highly noteworthy with respect to our primary hypothesis that Ln OPN’s association was statistically significant after removing the unassociated covariates [HR (95% CI) = 1.24 (1.01, 1.52); P = 0.04)].

Model 1 showed a trend towards an increase in DST% of 0.6% per day during the workweek (p = 0.08).

The distractor*training interaction was approaching significance (F(4,72) = 2.175, P = 0.080) but had a large effect size (η p 2 = 0.108), suggesting an influence on response accuracy by practice effects or training effects, presumably from the eye exercise condition.

There was a significant effect of pH treatment on growth rates ( P = 0.01), with higher growth at pH 8.05 than 7.65, no significant effect of flow/DBL thickness ( P = 0.67) but and a near-significant interaction term ( P = 0.08 Table S2 ).

as well as in the perception task (Extensive Set, r s = .41, p <.001 and Intensive Set, r s = .35, p <.005); 3) the smaller the ER in the production task for the Intensive Set ( r s = .27, p <.05), and in the perception task (Extensive Set, r s = .17, p = .09, and Intensive Set, r s = .18, p = .08, marginal significance).

Increases in subsequent intervals were smaller, but resulted in an almost significant increase in length between 40° and 120° (9% over combined intervals; p = 0.08 after Bonferroni Correction).