Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fairly significant”

582 sentences · 582 papers · 684 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
fairly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, Table 3 shows the multiple comparison using Dunn’s multiple comparison test with the results being fairly significant ( p < 0.001) for the Watch–Access pair, very highly significant ( p < 0.00001) for the Watch anti-TB without duplicates pair, and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for the Watch anti-TB (all) pair.
fairly significantp = 9.1 × 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regional and whole‐brain voxel‐wise analyses After extracting the correlations between the GMVs of 90 cerebral regions in the AAL atlas (Tzourio‐Mazoyer et al., 2002 ) and auditory comprehension scores, with age, sex, and total intracranial volume effects removed, we found that the grey matter in the posterior temporal lobe had a fairly significant correlation with auditory comprehension, especially in MTG and ITG, with r = 0.529, p = 9.1 × 10 −4 and r = 0.541, p = 6.6 × 10 −4 , respectively, Bonferroni corrected.
fairly significantP = 0.0561.1× alphaqualifiedgold
29.7 ± 16.1; P = 0.004).[ 34 ] In our study, the Ki-67 labeling index is higher in the pT2 stage in 17 patients with the mean expression of 35.49 ± 27.24 as compared to the pT1 stage in 5 patients with a mean expression of 30.68 ± 34.97 but found to be fairly significant ( P = 0.056).
fairly significantp = 0.0591.2× alphaqualifiedgold
For the three explanatory variables in the model (‘attitude’, ‘subjective norms’, and ‘perceived behavioural control’) and the three pairs of countries, which gives a total of nine parameters, the differences are statistically very significant in as many as four cases ( p < 0.01), and fairly significant in one additional case ( p = 0.059).
fairly significantp=0.081.6× alphaqualifiedgold
The small-world clustering ( Fig 3D , left) for the positive edges showed a significant difference between CNT and MCS and a fairly significant difference (p=0.08) between CNT and UWS, but failed to distinguish between MCS and UWS, and the same for the negative edges, where it could only differentiate between CNT and UWS.
fairly significantp < 0.112.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on these findings, fairly significant ( p < 0.11) (positive) associations of the z-scores at baseline with the relative miR expression of miR-151α-5p (β= –0.25, 95% CI: –0.56 to 0.06, p = 0.111) and miR-191-5p (β= –0.13, 95% CI: –0.26 to 0.01, p = 0.06) in serum, for each 1-unit increase in relative miR expression in serum, were found.