borderline significancep = 0.075
In the present study, a multivariate analysis using 2-way MANOVA shows a borderline significance (p = 0.075) for the factor Susceptibility (IgG- vs.
In the present study, a multivariate analysis using 2-way MANOVA shows a borderline significance (p = 0.075) for the factor Susceptibility (IgG- vs.
pacificus can distinguish suitable food sources from pathogens, we calculated the correlation coefficients between chemotaxis and survival data ( Fig 5A ), which revealed only a weak trend for the whole data set (Spearman’s rho = 0.154, P = 0.075).
The gene BCAS1 was significantly downregulated by both S6K1 and S6K2 siRNA, respectively, and this was also borderline significant with simultaneous S6K1 and S6K2 silencing (p = 0.075).
The lone exception again is a loss of luxury consumption, which has a negative effect on the likelihood of “good” self-rated health and is approaching significance (p = .075).
Specifically, the interaction effect between group and the COMT gene for fatigue remained significant [F (2,151) = 6.44; p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.079], as well as maintaining a tendency towards significance for pain [F (2,174) = 2.629; p = 0.075, η 2 p = 0.029].
Although the overall significance of SP1 expression decreased in multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio indicated a marginally significant correlation between low SP1 expression and overall survival in intestinal-type cancer (hazard ratio = 0.603, P = 0.075).
On the other hand, at the final visits, visual field defects restricted to a single hemisphere were associated with better mean deviation ( P <0.001), closer angular deviation of vascular trunk to the vertical axis ( P = 0.017), and lesser highest IOP with marginal significance ( P = 0.075, Table 4 ).
Each medication was associated with an increased likelihood of CDI when CDI cases were compared to untested controls, however with p-values approaching significance (OR H2RA = 1.99, p-value = 0.075 and OR PPI = 1.82, p-value = 0.077).
There was a marginally significant main effect of question type, F (1, 69) = 3.26, P = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.05, a significant main effect of affect, F (2, 69) = 3.33, P = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.09, and a significant interaction between both factors, F (2, 69) = 3.74, P = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.10.
There was a non-significant trend toward significance postoperative dysphagia and PNI (p = 0.075) and tumor size (p = 0.068) ( Table 2 ).
The age of onset showed a negative relationship with the use of novel forms, this effect was marginally significant though (β = −0.2712, SE = 0.1524, z = −1.78, p =.075).
In the Baltic-Skagerrak region, microsatellites showed no isolation by distance (IBD) (R = 0.30, P = 0.13), and for mitochondrial DNA there was a nearly significant IBD (R = 0.46, P = 0.075) ( Fig 5A ).
Observed volume changes occurred for both the SRV and controls, but separation of SV and CO from the control LV and RV was not observed, although CO was trending toward significance for the RV ( p = 0.075).
Neurofilament H expression was slightly reduced on day 2 after footshock ( Figure 3C: t (10) = 2.422, p = 0.035), remained unchanged on day 28 but showed a trend towards a reduction on day 60 after footshock ( Figure 3C: t (21) = 1.873, p = 0.075), while both MAP-2 and GFAP expression levels were not significantly altered at any of the three time points analyzed ( Figure 3D, E , see Table 1 for summary of all tested proteins).
Plasma IGFBP-2 levels correlated with CSF t-tau levels (r = 0.11, p = 0.040) and showed a trend with p-tau levels (r = 0.09, p = 0.075).
Screening of maternal sera with p305 (α 1G ) and with p330 (α 1H ) indicated a tendency for the CHB + and CHB − groups to have differential reactivity for the peptides, although these results were of marginal significance (p = 0.075 and 0.184 for p305/α 1G and p330/α 1H , respectively).
Other age groups show positive estimates, with the age group 25–34 being close to significance (p = 0.075).
In Aβ – Ptau – individuals, atrophy rates are relatively small and fairly uniform across ROIs; in contrast, Aβ + Ptau – individuals show elevated atrophy rate for the hippocampus, with the difference between Aβ – Ptau – and Aβ + Ptau – individuals approaching significance (p = 0.075).
Results are marginally significant for Lepidoptera ( F 7,112 = 1.9, P = 0.075) and Coleoptera ( F 7,112 = 1.9, P = 0.073).
This permutation test also identified a marginally significant cluster of activity from 380 to 430 ms ( p = 0.075; 10,000 permutations), corroborated by a marginal main effect of number of words according to a 2×2 repeated-measures ANOVA on activity during this time window ( F (1,17) = 3.52; p = 0.078; two-word canonical: 3.72 nAm avg.
The corresponding interaction term in Model 1 of Table 2 indicating the 11.2 percentage point shift between the White advantage in time period 1 (i.e., 6.6pp) to the Black advantage in time period 2 (4.6pp) is marginally significant (p = 0.075).
The difference among pollinator size categories was marginally significant for live predators (Qb = 0.64, P = 0.075, df = 2), but not for artificial spider models ( Fig. 4 , Qb = 5.24, P = 0.124, df = 2).
The main effect of the factor label was significant in the freezer task, F(1, 113) = 4.18, p = .043, and marginally significant in the television task, F(1, 113) = 3.22, p = .075.
In addition, although not statistically significant, an increasing trend was observed in the progression of distant metastasis and Dukes’ stage ( P = 0.075 and 0.083, respectively).
trace dipstick proteinuria, the association of trace dipstick proteinuria was significant or borderline significant for mortality due to CVD (1.39 [1.15–1.69]), cancer (1.13 [0.99–1.29], p = 0.075), and other causes (1.47 [1.28–1.69]) ( S5 Table ).