Excerpts

However, for female flowers this correlation was marginally significant ( Fig. 4B ; R = −0.374, P = 0.072, N = 24), indicating a slight trend that throat hair negatively related to seed number per fruit.

Smoking appeared to be insignificant–a borderline significance was reported (B = -0.17, p = 0.072) ( Table 3 ).

Indeed, Diff_RT showed a trend towards significance of the Session×Action-type×Group interaction (F(1,10) = 4.05, p = .072).

Nevertheless, there was only a borderline significant trend between the immersive+ and the immersive condition, t (43.80) = -2.83, p = .072, d = .86.

However, the difference in the relative amount of maximum correlation between the responses to the different playbacks after subtraction of randomly occurring correlations for each of the playback conditions accounts at the most for a statistical trend ( χ 2 (6) = 11.571, p = 0.072).

Age showed a borderline significant association (adjusted OR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.64–1.02, p = 0.072), while gender, BMI, and baseline HbA1c were not significantly associated with treatment response.

A marginal significance (p = 0.072) was observed between the wGRS and guttate psoriasis.

Although significant differences in sexual violence related attitudes were not observed (likely due by sample size constraints), among those that were examined, positive attitudes towards the ranking of physical attractiveness and sharing of nude photos among LGB+ South Asians particularly approached significance in bivariable analyses (p = 0.072).

With respect to the difference in number of mazes solved and number of mazes indicated as solved, participants in the low mobility condition over-reported more than those in the high mobility condition on a marginally significant level, t (107) = 1.82, p = 0.072, d = .293, 95% CI [-.037, .850].

Testing-naïve older adults showed a tendency for higher recognition of near- than far-distance objects, particularly for context-atypical and unfamiliar objects, with this pattern marginally significant (p = .072) for the unfamiliar objects ( M near = .73, .85, and .79 for context-typical, context-atypical, and unfamiliar; M far = .71, .77, and .60, respectively).

The relationship between change in hip judgments (pre-post) and EDE-Q score approached significance in the LB condition ( r s = −.295, p = .072, the higher the EDE-Q score the more negative the change in hip size judgment), however, change in BISS and change in hip judgments did not correlate with each other ( r s = .006, p = .973).

A similar effect with greater relative left frontal activation in response to anger as compared to greater relative right frontal activation to pain was also observed at mid-frontal electrodes (F3, F4) where the difference between the frontal EEG alpha asymmetry scores in response to facial expressions of anger and pain was marginally significant, t (19) = 1.90, p = .072 (see Table 1 ).

There was a marginally significant interaction between burn and year ( χ 2 = 3.23, df = 1, p = 0.072).

While the associations with insects (p = 0.051) were marginally significant, the associations with algae (p = 0.072), fungi (p = 0.1525), mollusks (p = 0.355), inanimate environment (p = 0.4165), nematodes (p = 0.5072), fruits and vegetables (p = 0.5176), bacteria (p = 0.783) and mammals (p = 0.8668) were not statistically significant.

Because there was a borderline significant but moderate degree of heterogeneity among the 19 studies (I 2 = 33.1%, P = 0.072), we performed sensitivity analyses to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.

Interestingly and consistently, rs3761581 from the best overall model in males conferred a marginally significant role on the development of CAD (OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.57–1.02; P = 0.072) after adjusting for age, type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI and SBP, and in females, interaction probability of rs7119375 and rs9943582 from the best overall model reached statistical significance (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.81–0.95; P = 0.02), these findings further validating that from MDR method.

Immunohistochemical analysis of Von Willebrand stained slides showed a trend to an increased grade of endothelialization in the ApoA-I coated stents compared to BMS ( P = 0.072).

Using a linear combination post-estimation test, we find that the comparison between the indirect and direct empathy conditions is only marginally significant ( β = .749, p = .072).

Results Participants in the variety condition reported marginally significant more weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA ( p = .072) over the course of the intervention and higher psychological needs satisfaction (p = .099) at four weeks relative to the comparison.

Based on biomarker expression, AR positive patients had DFS of 122 months while negative patients had shorter DFS of 45 months, but this was borderline significant ( P = 0.072).

Moreover, since Shapiro-Wilk test showed no normal distribution for each condition of the VSPT task (all p < .001) and for the RRS (p = .002), and a trend towards significance for the MAAS (p = .072), the proportion of altercentric responses on the VSPT task was arcsine transformed [ 68 ] and the raw scores on the RRS and MAAS were transformed in z scores.

Paired t-tests revealed no significant difference for misses and false alarms between block 4 and the final block (misses: t (48) = -.382, p = 0.704); false alarms: t (47) = -1.263, p = 0.213), and a trend toward significance for percentage of correct trials ( t (48) = 1.840, p = .072).

When comparing the RPD percentages in the gait parameters of the affected and the unaffected limbs, the PLA group showed a decrease, i.e., clinical deterioration, in all three parameters measured in the affected limb during the 12-week period, which was significant for PVF ( Fig 3 ), close to significance for VI (p = 0.072), or not significant (DSP).

Three of the four interaction terms yield insignificant coefficients, indicating that the manipulations were overall effective regardless of the participant’s reported level of BGC (as reported by [ 35 ]), with the exception of a marginally significant interaction for the essay prime in the expenditure model (p = .072).

Patients with cN3 showed significantly lower LRC (p = 0.002) and patients with p16 positive tumors a statistical trend (p = 0.072) towards higher LRC in univariable regression.