Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Specifically, while there was a significant main effect of Accent in how manipulative the Palestinian delegate was viewed ( F (2, 445) = 3.83, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.01), this effect was driven by a marginally significant difference in manipulativeness ratings between the Mild ( M = 3.69, SD = 1.74) and Heavy ( M = 4.24, SD = 1.80; t = 2.19, p = 0.07, d = 0.25) accent conditions with there being no significant differences in manipulativeness ratings between the Native-like (M = 3.96, SD = 1.94) and Mild ( t < 1) and Heavy accent conditions ( t = 1.30, p = 0.40, d = 0.13).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Upon further consideration of confounders in Mode 3, 1–2 cups/day of total coffee or caffeinated coffee was still associated with a lower risk of constipation although it is marginally significant for total coffee (total coffee: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35–1.06, p = 0.07); caffeinated coffee: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.95, p = 0.03).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).
borderline significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
While loci harbouring ITLN1 and CCL2 , both reported as CD specific genes showed borderline significance p = 0.07 and 0.06 respectively, other notable functional genes/ loci such as CARD9 , IL26 , IL12B , CEP72, PUS10 , FCGR2A , KIF21B , CDKAL1 and MAP3K7IP2 otherwise replicated in Caucasians were not significantly associated with UC in north Indians ( Table 1 ).
borderline significancep<0.071.4× alpha
An analysis of the combined survival curves of these three experiments provided statistical power for a more robust analysis resulting in statistically significant (p = 0.05) log-rank tests between survival curves of non-vaccinated, BCG, and BCG-H56/IC31 ® by one-sided and borderline significance (p<0.07) for two-sided analyses (see S4 Fig ).
approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
Factor 3: Conflict Management The two groups were not significantly different based on their scores of conflict management, although the p value approached significance ( t (195) = 1.82, p = .07), with Group 1 demonstrating reduced conflict management in the presence of the dog in comparison to Group 2, but we do not consider this effect reliable given the multiple testing undertaken.