expert urologists) in MRI presentations in MDT (correlation coefficient: r = 0.61 [95% CI 0.41–0.75], p < 0.001), and a borderline significance in the written MRI reports (correlation coefficient: r = 0.25 [95% CI -0.02–0.48], p = 0.07).
Nestbox-oriented song rate The two groups sang at the same rate before treatment (p = 0.57) increasing song rate over time (time, F (2,108) = 19.66, p<0.0001) with a nearly significant treatment×time interaction (F (2,108) = 2.79, p = 0.07; treatment, F (1,108) = 1.06, p = 0.31, Fig. 1b ).
In addition, a marginally significant difference between cultural idioms and novel metaphors was observed ( p = .07) showing that instructive expressions were the most demanding and difficult to process for the children.
[23] included PHYB in their analysis of the role of flowering time genes in the evolution of cultivated sunflower and found marginally significant evidence for selection during improvement ( P = 0.07).
Several findings hover near significance (e.g., P=0.07) but are described a bit too confidently.
Meanwhile, the Wald test approached significance for PSEPAD to be a predictor of correct classification ( p = .07).
This time, the main effect of Arousal just failed to reach significance ( F (2,41) = 2.80, p = .07, η p 2 = .12, MSE = 0.003).
A repeated measures ANOVA of all observers’ data revealed a marginally significant effect of condition on MOT performance, F (2, 10) = 3.48, p = .07.
And continuous antithrombotic agents was one of risk factors with borderline significance (p = 0.07).
The differences in students spacing patterns over the quarter differed by section for Year 1 [ X 2 (6, N = 544) = 19.51, p < .001], although this effect was only marginally significant for Year 2 [ X 2 (6, N = 782) = 11.31, p = .07] ( Fig 2B ).
The repeated measures ANOVA showed that SAR did not affect soil pH value in the PF ( p = 0.997), but it significantly reduced soil pH value in the BF ( p = 0.01) and the reduction was marginally significant in the MF ( p = 0.07).
For ward patients (n = 571) who were not admitted to critical care during the 48hrs pre or post onset of infection NEWS predicted 30-day mortality (AUROC 0.80, 95%CI 0.73–0.86) better across all values than any other tool (SOFA, 0.73, 95%CI 0.66–0.80; SIRS, 0.70, 95% CI 0.64–0.77; qSOFA, 0.72, 95%CI 0.65–0.80), although the difference for SOFA was not quite statistically significant (DeLong’s p = 0.07), in predicting 30-day mortality but performed significantly better than SIRS (p = 0.003) or qSOFA (p = 0.007).
The Modality factor was close to significance (F[ 1 , 20 ] = 3.81, p < 0.07).
The study found marginally significant differences between Sad and Neutral faces (p = .070) ( Table 3 ).
Yet, the counts yielded only a marginally significant difference for n = 75 ( p = .07).
Following the addition of complex II substate succinate, O 2 flux (CI + CII OXPHOS) remained lower in the MCT + BB group, but there was only a trend towards significance in the MCT group (p = 0.07).
One-way ANOVA using the percentage values presented in Figure 2 showed that the effect of time points was close to significance for BMC (F[3,82] = 2.42, P = 0.07).
In cardiac nerve bundles, %AAT of 8-OHdG-ir showed a trend (p < 0.07, η p 2 = 0.367) toward an overall effect of treatment, which was significant when treatment was considered in combination with region (treatment x region: %AAT, p < 0.04, η p 2 = 0.309; OD, p < 0.03, η p 2 = 0.312).
Livestock loss due to lions and respondent’s gender had negative coefficient estimates that were almost significant (coefficients -0.13, P = 0.07 and -0.13, P = 0.06, respectively).
Table 1 shows no significant differences of lateralization were found although there was a trend towards significance ( p = 0.07), with a large effect size ( r = 0.41) when comparing RVF-ACC between high and low progesterone phases.
16.7% respectively) although these differences did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.07 for both).
-How might confounding variables may shift results showing survival analysis results demonstratinhg a near-significant difference in log-rank tests for DTR vs. non-DTR (p=0.07), especially given that logistic regression finds DTR to be a significant independent predictor. -Given the relatively advanced age and high comorbidity burden, do you have severity-of-illness scores (e.g., APACHE II, SOFA on admission)?
When comparing untrained LZR versus LZR+EXT, the post hoc analyses showed significant decreased (12%) in HR (p<0.05), while only a marginal significance was found for OZR versus OZR+EXT (p = 0.07).
Regarding the normal karyotype AML subgroup only a negative trend for the DNMT3B expression on EFS and OS (p = 0.07) was detected.
Instead, in presence of the cylinder Reachability and Comfort distances almost overlapped and were larger than with other stimuli (at least p<0.002; Comfort-distance with robot approached significance, p = 0.07).