Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Proportional prey selection did not differ significantly between seasons neither for males (Friedman χ 2 early dry-late dry = 10.17, df = 7, p = 0.18; Friedman χ 2 early dry-wet = 9.57, df = 7, p = 0.21; Friedman χ 2 late dry-wet = 11.70, df = 7, p = 0.11), nor for females even though results approached significance level (Friedman χ 2 early dry-late dry = 12.95, df = 7, p = 0.07; Friedman χ 2 early dry-wet = 11.67, df = 7, p = 0.11; Friedman χ 2 late dry-wet = 12.45, df = 7, p = 0.08).
only marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).