Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a marked trend”

423 sentences · 423 papers · 699 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a marked trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
By multivariate analysis, the clinical response to high-dose etoposide was demonstrated to have a significant impact or a marked trend toward a higher CR achievement (OR, 2.331 (1.481–3.891), P < 0.001), longer PFS (HR, 0.210 (0.069–0.643), P = 0.006), and OS (HR, 0.183 (0.062–0.543), P = 0.002).
a marked trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the general BC group env positivity in blood was negatively correlated with age considering any group of comparison, and a marked trend towards a negative correlation with LNM (Tau-b = −0.4, p = 0.051) was observed when samples positive for MMTV in blood and tumor were compared with samples that were positive only in tumor tissue ( Table 4 ).
a marked trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Parameters and Treatment Outcome Among the study clinical/pathological and experimental variables, univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences for PNN and KCNQ1OT1 tumor gene expression ( p = 0.011 and p = 0.002, respectively) and only a marked trend for stage ( p = 0.056) ( Table 3 ).
a marked trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Since this amplicon is mostly found in P3F -positive cases, an analysis was also performed exclusively in the P3F -positive category ( n = 45) and confirmed that this amplicon is associated with a significant decrease in failure-free survival ( p = 0.042) and a marked trend toward a worse overall survival ( p = 0.056) [ 13 ].
a marked trendP = .061.2× alphagold
When examining BMI as an independent variable, we observed a marked trend ( P = .06) for hip fracture patients in which the low-weight and morbidly obese cohorts have the highest mortality rates.
The Role of BMI in Hip Fracture Surgery.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil · 2018 · PMC5813852
a marked trendP = 0.0621.2× alphagold
The four-way mixed ANOVA, comprising gender (male or female) as the between-subjects factor, and the deviant type (fearful or angry), coronal site (left, midline, right) and anterior-posterior site (frontal or central) as the within-subjects factors, revealed a main effect of coronal site (left, midline, right) [ F 2,276 = 7.09, P = .001, ηp 2 = 0.049, (1-β) ≈ 100%] as well as a marked trend of deviant type (fearful vs. angry) [ F 1,138 = 3.53, P = 0.062, ηp 2 = 0.025 (1-β) = 96.43%].
a marked trendp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
While there was no difference in humanization of the moving figures between all three groups, there was a marked trend that APS evaluated the figures as being less human compared to healthy participants (“humanization”; F(2) = 2.99, p = 0.064; post-hoc Bonferroni correction: pAPS = 0.064 (see all differences in Table 3 )). 3.3.