Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
The main effect of group approached significance, F(1, 46) = 3.46, p = .07, η P 2 = .07 (words recalled: CM group = 6.00, Control group = 7.04, and there was a main effect of retention interval, F(1, 46) = 67.26, p<.0001, η P 2 = .60 (immediate recall = 7.44 words, delayed recall = 5.60 words), but group did not interact with retention interval (p = .71) (see Figure 2 ).
almost significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
No main effect of task was significant but Figs 3 – 6 and post-hoc Newman-Keuls analyses showed that 1) the participants exhibited significantly lower CoP displacement in the searching dynamic task than in the free-viewing dynamic task (post-how Newman-Keuls analyses were significant for R ML , V ML , V AP ( p <0.032) and almost significant for SD ML ( p = 0.07) and that 2) the participants did not exhibit any significant difference in CoP displacement between the searching static and free-viewing static tasks ( ns ).