Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

close to significanceP = 0.0651.3× alpha
The correlation between the frequency of the G247S mutation and propoxur resistance was close to significance (r 2 = 0.732, P = 0.065), and there was a significant linear relationship between the frequency of the A328S mutation and propoxur resistance (r 2 = 0.891, P = 0.016) ( Figure 2 C, D).
a suggestive trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
Thirdly, the body of evidence on job stress and dissatisfaction could not demonstrate a clear association with mental health problems but only a suggestive trend, with nine of the 11 comparisons showing harm (82%, 95%CI [48%;98%], p = 0.065) ( Table 2 ) [ 26 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 48 , 49 ].
near significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
The results of multiple comparisons among the three surgical subgroups showed that interleukin-8 levels in the aortic surgery group (median, 100 pg/mL; IQR, 32–196 pg/mL) tended to be higher than the valve surgery group (median, 49 pg/mL; IQR, 31–79 pg/mL) with near significance ( p = 0.065), and significantly higher than the OPCAB group (median, 35 pg/mL; IQR, 20–57 pg/mL) ( p = 0.001).
a positive trendp = 0.0651.3× alphagold
The results of earlier correlation studies performed for 17–20 European countries [172] , [173] were confirmed by the present study, wherein a positive trend was observed for the 29 European countries (B = 4.05, p = 0.065, Eta 2 = 0.135), but, this correlation could not be detected for the entire 88 countries.
almost significantlyp = 0.0651.3× alpha
The minor allele of rs9402571, which was found to associate with a higher insulin secretion in the screening (TUEF) as well as the replication (EUGENE2) populations, associated almost significantly (p = 0.065; adjusted for age, family history of diabetes, and BMI) with a lower prevalence of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio: 0.845; 95%CI: 0.706–1.011), comparing the 659 diabetic patients with the non-diabetic 3798 METSIM participants.
a trend towards significancep = 0.0651.3× alpha
Further 2×2 ANOVAs performed on synapse density from the other spines categories failed to show an effect of plannexin or water maze training or their interaction [but note that a trend towards significance was found for plannexin treatment to reduce thin synapses (F 1,12 = 4.57, p = 0.065)].