Excerpts

Notably, in women, a negative trend was observed between the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and performance on the COWAT-F words ( rs = −.192, p = .056).

Interaction of ethnicity and gender was borderline significant ( p = 0.056) in the diabetic nephropathy subgroup, but was significant ( p = 0.030) in the nondiabetic nephropathy subgroup.

Although the odds ratio (OR) for the pooled RSA sample and the controls was only marginally significant (p = 0.056), OR for the RSA women with 2–3 abortions and the controls was significant (p = 0.03), suggesting a protective role for the allele ( Table 2 ).

Dropping the weakest predictor, age, b < 0.01, SE = 0.01, t (162) = 0.09, p = .931, led to a model that just missed significance, R 2 = .045, F (3, 163) = 2.57, p = .056.

There was also a marginally significant main effect of ASMR video type on changes in affect, F (1, 103) = 2.13, p = .056, η 2 p = .11.

Rhythmic entrainment scores did not differ at baseline; however, there was a statistical trend for individuals in the control group to score 0.62 points less than the music group ( β = -0.62, SE = 0.32, t = -1.95, p = 0.056; see Fig 3 ).

The patients harboring c.3321delA (homozygous and heterozygous) displayed a trend of earlier age of onset (0.16 and 0.81 years, respectively) compared with the wild-type genotype (1.07 years), which although displayed no statistical significance but showed a trend among three groups ( P = 0.056) ( Table 4 ) .

Post-hoc tests revealed a marginally significant difference between response times of the two Groups for asynchronous Stroking (independent samples t-test, t(22) = 2.0, p = .056).

A marginal trend suggested that in Spain HoH skilled readers scored lower than HoH less-skilled readers ( b = −1.05, SE = 0.55, z = −1.91, p = .056).

Furthermore, maternal age had a borderline significance influence on the likelihood of a health facility delivery (AOR = 1.3; CI: 1.0–3.9; p = 0.056).

We found that there was a marginal significance for RFS in ER-negative (ER-) group with higher PA1-nuc level ( Figure S1 B, P = 0.056).

We observed a marginally significant difference between the neutral-matched and neutral-nonmatched words (p = 0.056), with slightly faster RTs to the neutral-nonmatched words ( Table 2 ).

A borderline significant interaction between H. pylori cagA status and genotypes at rs2294008 was observed for the combined group of subjects with IM or dysplasia (p = P = 0.056), in which the association appeared stronger in the cagA -positive group (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.29–2.42) than the cagA -negative group (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.63–1.68).

In multivariate analysis for high-grade prostate cancer, there was no significant association for patients older than 60 years, whereas the DM+PC group showed borderline significance regarding the risk of high-grade prostate cancer detection for younger men (OR 5.019, P = 0.056).

We found a “tone by TMS stimulation condition by time” interaction effect with a statistical trend (F = 2.820; df = 3,30; p = 0.056).

3 ; Table 2 ), while OS showed a marginally non-significant trend (F 1,308 = 3.68; p = 0.056; Table 2 ).

alien species was not significantly different (t ≤ 1.2, p > 0.05, in 8 sites), and only in one site (Playa Maya), alien species showed a marginally significant higher normalized degree (t 270 = 1.95, p = 0.056).

Results Tissue oxygenation For the mean Δ[HHb] from all conditions, sites and bouts combined, there was a main effect for site (p = 0.003, F = 7.493), with significant differences found between FH and VL sites (p = 0.025) and the difference between GN and VL sites approaching significance (p = 0.056).

When primary Gleason pattern of 3 at biopsy, PSA level >10 but <20 resulted in a 19% higher risk of PTUS comparing with PSA < = 10 but with marginal significance (p = 0.056).

In the right single-leg positions, a tendency toward significance was observed (p = 0.056).

healthy controls) of the time needed until the first target was cancelled revealed a significant main effect of the factor ‘column’ (F(3, 144) = 6.545, p < .001), a significant main effect of the factor ‘group’ (F(1, 48) = 5.093, p = .029), and a marginally significant main effect of the factor ‘condition’ (F(3, 144) = 2.573, p = .056).

A marginally significant difference was observed between the infant and younger-adult faces: t (20) = 2.03, p <0.056, indicating more attraction towards the relevant age categories when categorizing infant compared to adult faces ( Figures 2 & 3 ).

This difference almost reached significance ( p = 0.056, see Table 1 ).

A high Gleason score increased at the limit of significance the risk of PCa specific death (HR = 3.34, p = 0.056; C-index = 0.81).

oceanicus at 58°N was marginally insignificant (t-test, t = −2.06, P = 0.056).