showed a trendp = 0.055
In multivariate analysis, controlled for age, only being HLA B 5701 positive showed a trend (p = 0.055) for association with T2D, Table 3 .
In multivariate analysis, controlled for age, only being HLA B 5701 positive showed a trend (p = 0.055) for association with T2D, Table 3 .
The measure of x-flips only attained marginal significance, with 4% of its variance explained by trial and block trial ( p = .055).
Finally, test operator was found to be only a marginally significant predictor of the FP rate in the weighted regression analysis (ß = −2.7E-7, p = .055).
Bottlenecks We recovered no evidence for genetic bottlenecks for any sampling locality with the TPM or SMM, although the TPM for SC6 approached significance ( Table 4 ; P = 0.055).
Lastly, the item standing on a balance beam (BOT-2), showed a trend towards differences between the two groups on pre-test values ( t = -2.06, df = 16.59, p = 0.055, corrected for unequal variance; TD 9.9 (0.33) DCD 8.6 (SD 2.4).
A significant effect of time on SEPS1 mRNA level was identified using ANOVA. Post-hoc testing found that SEPS1 mRNA increased (P = 0.007) one week after the influenza vaccine (week 11) compared to pre-vaccination (week 10) in the 100 μg/day Se-yeast group and there was a similar increase in the 200 μg/day Se-yeast group, which was of borderline significance (P = 0.055).
Nevertheless, there was a marginally insignificant slope by species interaction ( F 4, 46.869 = 2.500, P = 0.055).
The association of CNV or mutation with OS within the whole PI3KCA/AKT pathway was very close to statistical significance (p = 0.055) ( Fig 1 ).
However, when using independent t-tests to examine group differences in amount of SWS, we found a nearly significant difference between the Immediate and 4-Hour groups (t = −2.07, p = .055).
Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction [F(1,15) = 4.35, p = 0.055] with new English words faster than new Spanish words [t(15) = 3.12, p = 0.007].
The interaction between Norm Type and Willingness to Donate was marginally significant, F (2, 386) = 2.93, p =.055, η p 2 =.015).
The Tau K r tests revealed slightly different results with the significance of non-independent data between spatial proximity and relatedness occurring in session 1 (Tau K r = −0.106, p = 0.003), 4 (Tau K r = −0.101, p = 0.006), the single day (Tau K r = −0.121, p = 0.003), approaching significance in session 2 (Tau K r = −0.029, p = 0.055), but none in session 3 (Tau K r = −0.049, p = 0.180).
The density correlation function which relates seed content in fecal deposits to nearby deposit density was marginally significant at Martinazo (P = 0.055, Fig 5e ), exceeding the upper envelope at short (r = 0.5–2.5 m) and long (r = 47 m) distances.
For engagement-matched stimuli, there was also a significant main effect of group ( F (1,185) = 19.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.09), and the predicted group x stimulus type interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,185) = 3.7, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.02).
The main effect of Type of HoloLens was not significant for both tasks (2D stepping target: F (1,15) = 0.76, p = 0.398, ƞ p 2 = 0.048; 3D obstacle crossing: F (1,15) = 2.64, p = 0.125, ƞ p 2 = 0.149), while the Type of Object × Type of HoloLens interaction was borderline significant for 2D target-stepping ( F (1,15) = 4.34, p = 0.055, ƞ p 2 = 0.225; Fig 5B ) and 3D obstacle-crossing ( F (1,15) = 4.62, p = 0.048, ƞ p 2 = 0.235; Fig 4C ) tasks, indicating that, at least for holographic 3D obstacle crossing, the initial orientation was significantly smaller for HoloLens 2 than for HoloLens 1 ( t (15) = 2.23, p = 0.041) in the absence of HoloLens differences for real-world 3D obstacles ( t (15) = -0.57, p = 0.578), a finding consistent with our expectations regarding the difference in AR-FOV size between HoloLenses.
In participants with an eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73m 2 per SD increase in OPG there was a marginally non-significant 11% increase in the risk of 15 year death in unadjusted (HR 1.11, 95%CI 1.00–1.22, P = 0.055) that remained non-significant after multivariable-adjustment (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.94–1.17, P = 0.398).
Alternatively, significant genetic structure was detected in sampling session 2, but not in the Tau K r test, although it approached significance (p = 0.055).
There was a strong trend towards a drug effect on adolescent locomotion (F(5,67) = 2.298, p = 0.055), primarily driven by quinpirole, the only treatment significantly different from saline (p = 0.031).
For WC a significant increase was found in males (1.6 cm; p <0.001), while females showed a trend towards a significant increase (0.6 cm; p = 0.055) between year 4 and 5 (T4-T5).
D-dimer level also approaches statistical significance as a predictive factor (OR = 1.471, p = 0.055).
The ONC/BMD drop + IP treatment group in the middle section showed a nearly significant positive correlation between DAPI-stained total retinal cell counts and RGC counts ( p = 0.055, r = 0.348), and between DAPI-stained cells and GFAP gliosis expression ( p = 0.059, r = 0.297).
After the stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for covariates, fasting insulin, HbA1c and A/G ratio were found to be negatively associated with serum irisin with statistical significance, while waist circumference was negatively associated with irisin level with statistically marginal significance (p = 0.055).
It was significant for the siblings (r = −0.51, P = 0.003) and nearly significant for the field males (r = −0.57, P = 0.055) but not for the museum specimens (r = −0.495, P = 0.089).
The probability of becoming infected tended to be lower in immune (T IMtoINF-2005 = 0.026; se = 0.019) than in susceptible animals (T SUtoINF-2005 = 0.083; se = 0.030) although this effect was only marginally statistically significant (W = 1.61, p = 0.055).
The latency time of diaspore discovery by ants did not differ among partially defleshed and intact fruits ( t test = 1.01, df = 19, p = 0.32, Fig 5A ) and the difference between the number of ant species attending to piles of partially defleshed and intact fruits was low and marginally non-significant ( t test = 2.04, df = 19, p < 0.055, Fig 5B ).