Excerpts

With respect to the impact of baseline work engagement, those with a low score approached significance (p = 0.053; b = −0.3) to an effect on work engagement at 12 months.

The difference between urban networks and semi-natural landscape networks was marginally non-significant (Tukey test P = 0.053 ).

The inverse relationship also existed for plants with different leaf habits ( r 2 = 0.14, 0.25, and 0.30, and p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.05 for DB, EB and conifer, respectively; Figure 1b-d ), although it was only marginally significant for N-fixers ( r 2 = 0.20; p = 0.053; Figure 1d ).

However; there was a marginally significant effect of the COVID-19 period on body weight, with a relative weight gain of 1.5 kg ± 0.58 for the COVID group, F(4 , 59) = 578 , t = 2.0, P = 0.053, as well as a significant increase (+1.7 kg ± 1.35) in diastolic blood pressure, F(4 , 59) = 10 . 7 , t = 2.16, P = 0.035, f 2 = 0.08.

Moderate GCS impairment (9–12) showed a borderline non-significant trend (SHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25–1.01, p = 0.053).

The frequency of occurrence of MSFFs showed marginally significant seasonal differences (P = 0.053, Table 3A , Fig 4A ), with the greatest frequency of occurrence in winter with an average of 12 MSFFs per month.

There was a statistical trend of a significant effect of the feeding regime (F 5.22,292.28 = 2.38, P = 0.053, partial η2 = 0.127; S3 Table ) indicating that the time to reach the maximum increase in ΔTb was slightly longer for bat kept under food restriction ( Fig 6 ; S5 Table ).

Results In all participants studied, the exposure to violence was significant and negatively correlated with DNA methylation of MST1R loci (p = 0.032; r = -0.971) and nominally significant with NR3C1 loci (p = 0.053; r = -0.948).

The only marginally significant post hoc comparison was between the responsibility ( M = 5.66, SD = 1.03) and control conditions (control M = 5.21, SD = 1.04; blame M = 5.43, SD = 1.06), p = .053.

Soil temperature was not higher in the squares containing more larvae ( t = −0.16, P = 0.55, LMM), and it was almost significantly higher in cages containing larvae [24.63 ± 0.13°C (mean ± SE, n = 8 cages)] than in those without larvae [24.48 ± 0.13°C (mean ± SE, n = 8 cages), t 7 = 2.32, P = 0.053, paired t -test].

Three out of four survival-associated SNPs passed multiple testing correction using the FDR method [19] for 11.8 independent SNPs ( p = 0.013, 0.0067, 0.0073 for rs130274, rs1962223 and rs715572, respectively); the fourth SNP (rs5754312), showed borderline significance after correction (p = 0.053).

There was a marginally significant interaction, β= -0.06, p = .053, 95%CI = [-0.11, 0.0008].

Patients younger than 60 years showed a trend towards higher likelihood of BRAF mutations (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 0.99–3.70, p = 0.053).

18.8% [0–38.7]%; p = 0.041) and marginally significant for the menopause and health domain (40.7% [16.9–62.9]% vs. 13.6% [0.0–45.6]%; p = 0.053) ( Table 2 and Fig 4 ), representing the domain of vasomotor symptoms, hot flashes, sleep quality, and aging perception.

However, in the SBP course the overall interaction with TG, and in the DBP course the overall interaction with FFA, were almost significant (p = 0.053 and p = 0.064, respectively).

Similarly, lifetime GAD also had near-significant association with experiencing the earthquake as a traumatic event (p = 0.053).

Significant down-regulation was observed in the expression of apolipoprotein genes including ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoB100, ApoC4 and ApoE ( Fig 2 ), and a decrease of borderline significance was observed in the expression of ApoF expression (P = 0.053).

However, the interaction between SLD and EF approached significance, b = 12.69, SE = 6.46, t (91) = 1.96, p = .053, 95% CI [−.15, 25.53], indicating a possible moderating effect of EF on the link between SLD and rumination.

In PD patients there was a difference of borderline significance with lower KS30 in the more affected hand when compared to the less affected hand (mean KS30 42.5 v 44.8, p = 0.053).

This correlation was barely significant at the genetic level (r = −0.29, P = 0.053).

Joint Analysis of Pneumonitis Risk Alleles In combined analysis, the significant SNPs together with an additional borderline significant variant – IL4R: rs1801275 ( P = 0.053) – showed an increase in pneumonitis risk as the number of unfavorable genotypes increased ( Table 3 ).

A marginal significance is found in terms of having concerns about community care among the three groups (P = 0.053).

When the same analysis was carried out excluding individuals with cirrhosis at baseline the presence of the PNPLA3 rs738409 G showed a trend to association with significant LSP (adjusted p-value = 0.053; adjusted odds ratio = 2.73; 95% CI = 0.98–7.56).

43%), but these differences were only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.053).

Because measures of motivation (response latencies and trial omissions) were unchanged across this final range of sessions ( p >.05), we examined the correlation between MAD values and mean retention intervals across this final range the correlation approached significance, r = .45, p = .053 ( Figure 3D ).