There was a slight statistically significant difference in the T1-T2 latencies (longer for the WSTP group) and an almost significant difference (p = 0.052) for the T2-T3 latencies (longer for the EC group).
Excerpts
Vocal and color signals The probability of emitting estrus calls was associated with reproductive status (LRT: X 2 = 13.33, Δdf = 4, P = 0.001, see Table C in S1 File for further details), decreasing significantly between the pre-conceptive period and the first month of pregnancy (GLMM: z = -3.19, P = 0.001, Fig 2B ), and then increasing again to near significance from the first to the second month of pregnancy (GLMM: z = 1.94, P = 0.052, Fig 2B , see Table D in S1 File for further details).
first glucose loading, maximal carbohydrate oxidation showed a borderline significant increase (0.238±0.010 and 0.221±0.009 g·min -1 , respectively; p = 0.052).
Table 5: Model adequacy is marginally significant (p=0.052) suggesting the model does not correctly fit.
After removing the non-significant interaction term from the regression, a main effect of race was found for the R hippocampus (B = -.17; p = .012), L hippocampus (B = -.20; p = .003), and was marginally significant for the L amygdala (B = -.13; p = .052), wherein Whites had greater volumes than AAs.
borderline non-significantp-value = 0.052
The pairwise difference in median viral loads between Antwerp and East Flanders is borderline non-significant (p-value = 0.052).
showed a trendP = 0.052
The risk of readmission showed a trend of increase for patients with a higher Z-score transformed SI (OR = 1.34 for a one SD increase in Z-score transformed SI, 95% CI = 1.00–1.79, P = 0.052).
For HER2, we saw an upregulation of this receptor in the cancerous tissue that was very close to being significant (p = 0.0520).
However, AI at the most telomeric marker D11S2071 showed a borderline significant association with earlier relapse compared to patients not showing and AI around this locus (p = 0.052)( Figure S1 ).
showed a trendp = 0.052
The complete re-sequencing of the 56 mtDNAs belonging to H5 revealed that AD patients showed a trend towards a higher number (p = 0.052) of sporadic mutations in tRNA and rRNA genes when compared with controls.
A borderline significant difference between the groups was found for HADS anxiety showing a higher HADS anxiety in patients with LBP (6.4 ± 4.6, p = 0.052).
Among T-implanted females, there was no detectable correlation between plasma T levels and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = −0.27, n = 10, p = 0.44), and there was a nearly significant positive correlation between female aggression score and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = 0.55, n = 13, p = 0.052), suggesting that, if anything, the behavioral effect of the T implant increased over time, rather than decreased.
Female+Bi-sexual) and variation in group size (P = 0.022, Table 2 ), and a marginally significant interaction for variation in sex ratio (P = 0.052, Table 2 ).
The MNND Lactuca distance showed a marginally significant effect on the growth and recruitment of Lactuca (p = 0,052 and 0.085, respectively; see Table 2 ).
This same pattern was evident for suicide plan and suicide attempt, though the ICR was smaller for these outcomes, and the ICR was only marginally significant (p = 0.052) for suicide attempt.
Third, there was a recurrent interaction effect between identifiability and manipulation group for three measures: personal distress, F (1, 1624) = 4.09, p = .043, n p 2 = .003, sympathy, F (1, 1624) = 4.75, p = .029, n p 2 = .003, and empathic concern, F (1, 1624) = 8.80, p = .003, n p 2 = .005, and near significance for distress ( p = .052).
However, in the multivariate analysis of FSRS and PI, FSRS was marginally significant (HR 1.017, 95% CI 0.999–1.036, p = 0.052).
Analysis showed that whole-hand grasping ability predicted gaze behavior in a marginally significant way ( n = 33, β = .34, t (31) = 2.02, p = .052, R 2 = .12).
of borderline significanceP = 0.052
Staging at the time of liver biopsy was significantly higher in late menopausal women than in full reproductive age and premenopausal groups (P<0.0001 for both) while it was of borderline significance vs. early menopause (P = 0.052) ( Table S3 , Figure 1 ).
A strong trend for a reduction in plasma TG concentration was also observed following training ( p = 0.052).
approached significancep = 0.052
In addition, the interaction effect (between Attractiveness and Offer) also approached significance [F (1,16) = 4.403, p = 0.052, partial η 2 = 0.216].
Specimens from the subsequent period at De Bruin, Period 2, scale larger than during the previous period (mean = 0.019) whereby the difference is approaching significance (Independent T-test, p = 0.052).
When comparing the scores provided by the LIWC, the results of the test indicated that participants came up with marginally significant more negative words in the rumination ( Mdn = 9.31) than in the control condition ( Mdn = 5.26), U = 331.00, z = −1.94, p = .052, while the negativity scores from SentiWordNet were significantly higher in the rumination condition ( Mdn = 0.08) than in the control condition ( Mdn = .05), U = 303.50, z = −2.33, p = .020.
Of the 8 explanatory variables in the model for adolescents one variable (fruit) changed from significant (p<0.001) in the univariable model to marginal significance in the multivariable model (p = 0.052).
The interaction between Condition and Group was marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 4.00, p = .052, η p 2 = .09.